Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35994938›Full record

ArticleThe International journal on drug policy2022

Jail-based reentry programming to support continued treatment with medications for opioid use disorder: Qualitative perspectives and experiences among jail staff in Massachusetts.

Atsushi Matsumoto, Claudia Santelices, Elizabeth A Evans, Ekaterina Pivovarova, Thomas J Stopka, Warren J Ferguson, Peter D Friedmann

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The International journal on drug policy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Atsushi MatsumotoInstitute for Health Equity and Social Justice Research, Northeastern University, 360 Huntington Ave, 3rd Floor INV, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. Electronic address: matsumoto.a@northeastern.edu.
Claudia SantelicesInstitute for Health Equity and Social Justice Research, Northeastern University, 360 Huntington Ave, 3rd Floor INV, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Elizabeth A EvansDepartment of Health Promotion and Policy, School of Public Health and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, 312 Arnold House, 715 North Pleasant St, Amherst, MA, 01003, USA.
Ekaterina PivovarovaDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, 55 Lake Avenue North, Worcester, MA, 01655, USA.
Thomas J StopkaDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, 136 Harrison Avenue, Boston, MA, 02111, USA.
Warren J FergusonDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, 55 Lake Avenue North, Worcester, MA, 01655, USA.
Peter D FriedmannUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School - Baystate and Baystate Health, 3601 Main Street, Springfield, MA, 01107, USA.
University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · USNortheastern University · USTufts University · USUniversity of Massachusetts Amherst · US

Funding

Massachusetts Justice Cooperative Opioid Innovation Network (JCOIN) Research CenterUG1DA050067 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST · PI EVANS, ELIZABETH A., FRIEDMANN, PETER D · 2019 to 2023
$10.5M
Drug Injection Surveillance and Care Enhancement for Rural Northern New England (DISCERNNE)UG3DA044830 · NIDA · BAYSTATE MEDICAL CENTER, INC. · PI FRIEDMANN, PETER D · 2017 to 2018
$1.6M
Increasing Referrals to Medications for Opioid Use Disorders from Drug Treatment Courts using Organizational Linkage InterventionK23DA049953 · NIDA · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI PIVOVAROVA, EKATERINA · 2020 to 2022
$612k
NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA049953NIDA NIH HHS UG1 DA050067NIDA NIH HHS UG3 DA044830
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndividuals with opioid use disorder released to communities after incarceration experience an elevated risk for overdose death. Massachusetts is the first state to mandate county jails to deliver all FDA approved medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD). The present study considered perspectives around coordination of post-release care among jail staff engaged in MOUD programs focused on coordination of care to the community.

methodsFocus groups and semi-structured interviews were conducted with 61 jail staff involved in implementation of MOUD programs. Interview guide development, and coding and analysis of qualitative data were guided by the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment (EPIS) framework. Deductive and inductive approaches were used for coding and themes were organized using the EPIS.

resultsSalient themes in the inner context focused on the elements of reentry planning that influence coordination of post-release care including timing of initiation, staff knowledge about availability of MOUD in community settings, and internal collaborations. Findings on bridging factors highlighted the importance of interagency communication to follow pre-scheduled release dates and use of bridge scripts to minimize the gap in treatment during the transition. Use of navigators was an additional factor that influenced MOUD initiation and engagement in community settings. Outer context findings indicated partnerships with community providers and timely reinstatement of health insurance coverage as critical factors that influence coordination of post-release care.

conclusionsCoordination of MOUD post-release continuity of care requires training supporting staff in reentry planning as well as resources to enhance internal collaborations and bridging partnerships between in-jail MOUD programs and community MOUD providers. In addition, efforts to reduce systemic barriers related to unanticipated timing of release and reinstatement of health insurance coverage are needed to optimize seamless post-release care.

Indexed as

BuprenorphineDrug OverdoseOpioid-Related DisordersHumansJailsMassachusettsOpiate Substitution TreatmentBuprenorphineEPIS frameworkJailsMedication for opioid use disorderOpioid use disorderPost-release coordination of care

Identifiers

PMID35994938
PMCPMC10206716
OpenAlexW4293277238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.