Article in PLoS genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literature
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Jun WangDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, United States of America.
Holly R ThomasDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3163-4578
Yu ChenDepartment of Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2037-7337
Stefanie M PercivalDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, United States of America.
Stephanie C WaldrepDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, United States of America.
Ryne C RamakerHudson Alpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, Alabama, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8666-4841
Robert G ThompsonDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0478-6181
Sara J CooperHudson Alpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, Alabama, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9627-0309
Zechen ChongDepartment of Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5750-1808
John M ParantDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9084-5098
University of Alabama at Birmingham · USHudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology · US
Funding
XRAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA013148 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI Robert S Welner · 1985 to 2026
$165.9M
UAB Center for Clinical and Translational Science (CCTS)UL1TR001417 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI KIMBERLY, ROBERT P. · 2015 to 2018
$31.4M
MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM008361 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI YACOUBIAN, TALENE ALENE · 1992 to 2024
$16.8M
UAB Pilot Center for Precision Animal Modeling (C-PAM) - Resource and Service SectionU54OD030167 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI Bradley K. Yoder · 2020 to 2026
$15.3M
UAB Childhood Cystic Kidney Disease Core Center (UAB-CCKDCC) - Therapeutic Development and Screening ResourceU54DK126087 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI Bradley K. Yoder · 2020 to 2026
$6.7M
Training Program in Cell, Molecular, and Developmental BiologyT32GM008111 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI YODER, BRADLEY K. · 1985 to 2022
$5.4M
Structural variation analysis with and without a reference genomeR35GM138212 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI Zechen Chong · 2020 to 2026
$2.6M
Deciphering How Esco2 Loss Acts as a Penetrance ModifierR01CA216108 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI PARANT, JOHN M · 2017 to 2021
$1.9M
Determining the Influence Genomic Instability During Embryogenesis has on Tumor PenetranceR21CA219546 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI PARANT, JOHN M · 2017 to 2018
Sister chromatid cohesion (SCC) is an important process in chromosome segregation. ESCO2 is essential for establishment of SCC and is often deleted/altered in human cancers. We demonstrate that esco2 haploinsufficiency results in reduced SCC and accelerates the timing of tumor onset in both zebrafish and mouse p53 heterozygous null models, but not in p53 homozygous mutant or wild-type animals. These data indicate that esco2 haploinsufficiency accelerates tumor onset in a loss of heterozygosity (LOH) sensitive background. Analysis of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) confirmed ESCO2 deficient tumors have elevated number of LOH events throughout the genome. Further, we demonstrated heterozygous loss of sgo1, important in maintaining SCC, also results in reduced SCC and accelerated tumor formation in a p53 heterozygous background. Surprisingly, while we did observe elevated levels of chromosome missegregation and micronuclei formation in esco2 heterozygous mutant animals, this chromosomal instability did not contribute to the accelerated tumor onset in a p53 heterozygous background. Interestingly, SCC also plays a role in homologous recombination, and we did observe elevated levels of mitotic recombination derived p53 LOH in tumors from esco2 haploinsufficient animals; as well as elevated levels of mitotic recombination throughout the genome of human ESCO2 deficient tumors. Together these data suggest that reduced SCC contributes to accelerated tumor penetrance through elevated mitotic recombination.
Indexed as
Chromosome SegregationNeoplasmsAcetyltransferasesAnimalsCell Cycle ProteinsChromatidsChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneHumansMicePenetranceTumor Suppressor Protein p53ZebrafishAcetyltransferasesCell Cycle ProteinsChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneESCO2 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Reduced sister chromatid cohesion acts as a tumor penetrance modifier. · full record | OpenQuestion