Observational studyPloS one2022
Ten-year in-hospital mortality trends among Japanese injured patients by age, injury severity, injury mechanism, and injury region: A nationwide observational study.
Observational study in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trends in occupational injuries 2017 to 2023: a secondary analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank.International journal of emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Association between red blood cell transfusion volume and infection risk: a dose-response analysis of a nationwide trauma registry.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Observational
- Prognostic Impact of Cardiovascular Injuries for Patients with Respiratory Isolated Chest Trauma.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2025Article
- Validation of cadaver-based trauma surgery training for lifelong skill development.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2025Article
- Role of the admission muscle injury indicators in early coagulopathy, inflammation and acute kidney injury in patients with severe multiple injuries.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2025Article
- Article
- Unified total body CT image with multiple organ specific windowings: validating improved diagnostic accuracy and speed in trauma cases.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Incidence, demographics and outcomes of patients with penetrating injury: a Japanese nationwide 10-year retrospective study.BMJ open · 2023Article
- Increased CT Use and No Change in Injury Severity among Child Motor Vehicle Victims: A National Trauma Database Study in Japan.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Diaphragmatic Injuries among Severely Injured Patients (ISS ≥ 16)-An Indicator of Injury Pattern and Severity of Abdominal Trauma.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Injury Severity Score (ISS) is widely used in trauma research worldwide. An ISS cutoff value of ≥16 is frequently used as the definition of severe injury in Japan. The mortality of patients with ISS ≥16 has decreased in recent years, owing to the developing the trauma care system. This study aimed to analyze the prevalence, in-hospital mortality, and odds ratio (OR) for mortality in Japanese injured patients by age, injury mechanism, injury region, and injury severity over 10 years. This study used the Japan Trauma Data Bank (JTDB) dataset, which included 315,614 patients registered between 2009 and 2018. 209,290 injured patients were utilized. This study evaluated 10-year trends of the prevalence and in-hospital mortality and risk factors associated with in-hospital mortality. The overall in-hospital mortality was 10.5%. During the 10-year study period in Japan, the mortality trend among all injured patient groups with ISS 0-15, 16-25, and ≥26 showed significant decreases (p <0.001). Moreover, the mortality risk of patients with ISS ≥26 was significantly higher than that of patients with ISS 0-15 and 16-25 (p <0.001, OR = 0.05 and p<0.001, OR = 0.22). If we define injured patients who are expected to have a mortality rate of 20% or more as severely injured, it may be necessary to change the injury severity definition according to reduction of trauma mortality as ISS cutoff values to ≥26 instead of ≥16. From 2009 to 2018, the in-hospital mortality trend among all injured patient groups with ISS 0-15, 16-25, and ≥26 showed significant decreases in Japan. Differences were noted in mortality trends and risks according to anatomical injury severity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.