ArticleThe British journal of radiology2022
Improving image quality and lung nodule detection for low-dose chest CT by using generative adversarial network reconstruction.
Article in The British journal of radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improved lung nodule segmentation with a squeeze excitation dilated attention based residual UNet.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- CT image denoising methods for image quality improvement and radiation dose reduction.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024Review
- Synthetic high-energy computed tomography image via a Wasserstein generative adversarial network with the convolutional block attention module.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo investigate the improvement of two denoising models with different learning targets (Dir and Res) of generative adversarial network (GAN) on image quality and lung nodule detectability in chest low-dose CT (LDCT).
methodsIn training phase, by using LDCT images simulated from standard dose CT (SDCT) of 200 participants, Dir model was trained targeting SDCT images, while Res model targeting the residual between SDCT and LDCT images. In testing phase, a phantom and 95 chest LDCT, exclusively with training data, were included for evaluation of imaging quality and pulmonary nodules detectability.
resultsFor phantom images, structural similarity, peak signal-to-noise ratio of both Res and Dir models were higher than that of LDCT. Standard deviation of Res model was the lowest. For patient images, image noise and quality of both two models, were better than that of LDCT. Artifacts of Res model was less than that of LDCT. The diagnostic sensitivity of lung nodule by two readers for LDCT, Res and Dir model, were 72/77%, 79/83% and 72/79% respectively.
conclusionTwo GAN denoising models, including Res and Dir trained with different targets, could effectively reduce image noise of chest LDCT. The image quality evaluation scoring and nodule detectability of Res denoising model was better than that of Dir denoising model and that of hybrid IR images. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: The GAN-trained model, which learned the residual between SDCT and LDCT images, reduced image noise and increased the lung nodule detectability by radiologists on chest LDCT. This demonstrates the potential for clinical benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.