Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35994202›Full record

ReviewCurrent osteoporosis reports2022

Muscle and Bone Defects in Metastatic Disease.

Martina Pauk, Hiroaki Saito, Eric Hesse, Hanna Taipaleenmäki

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current osteoporosis reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Physical Activity, Exerkines, and Their Role in Cancer Cachexia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Martina PaukInstitute of Musculoskeletal Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Hiroaki SaitoInstitute of Musculoskeletal Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Eric HesseInstitute of Musculoskeletal Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Hanna TaipaleenmäkiInstitute of Musculoskeletal Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany. hanna.taipaleenmaeki@med.uni-muenchen.de.ORCID 0000-0002-8254-9333
LMU Klinikum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe present review addresses most recently identified mechanisms implicated in metastasis-induced bone resorption and muscle-wasting syndrome, known as cachexia. RECENT

findingsMetastatic disease in bone and soft tissues is often associated with skeletal muscle defects. Recent studies have identified a number of secreted molecules and extracellular vesicles that contribute to cancer cell growth and metastasis leading to bone destruction and muscle atrophy. In addition, alterations in muscle microenvironment including dysfunctions in hepatic and mitochondrial metabolism have been implicated in cancer-induced regeneration defect and muscle loss. Moreover, we review novel in vitro and animal models including promising new drug candidates for bone metastases and cancer cachexia. Preservation of bone health could be highly beneficial for maintaining muscle mass and function. Therefore, a better understanding of molecular pathways implicated in bone and muscle crosstalk in metastatic disease may provide new insights and identify new strategies to improve current anticancer therapeutics.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsMuscular DiseasesNeoplasmsAnimalsCachexiaMuscle, SkeletalMuscular AtrophyTumor MicroenvironmentBone destructionCachexiaMetastasisMuscle weaknessSecreted factors

Identifiers

PMID35994202
PMCPMC9522697
OpenAlexW4292574096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.