Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35994200›Full record

ReviewDrugs2022

Ozanimod: A Review in Ulcerative Colitis.

Julia Paik

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Consistent efficacy outcomes between phase 2 and phase 3 trials in Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis in adults: a meta-analysis.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Advancing therapeutic frontiers: a pipeline of novel drugs for UC management.Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Julia PaikSpringer Nature, Mairangi Bay, Private Bag 65901, Auckland, 0754, New Zealand. demail@springer.com.
Springer Nature (New Zealand) · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ozanimod (Zeposia

Indexed as

Biological ProductsColitis, UlcerativeAdministration, OralAdultHumansIndansOxadiazolesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRemission InductionSphingosine-1-Phosphate ReceptorsBiological ProductsIndansOxadiazolesozanimodSphingosine-1-Phosphate Receptors

Identifiers

PMID35994200
PMCPMC9499884
OpenAlexW4292607701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.