Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35994194›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2023

Establishing robotic bariatric surgery at an academic tertiary hospital: a learning curve analysis for totally robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Anne Kauffels, Martin Reichert, Ingolf Askevold, Anna Bender, Andreas Hecker, Winfried Padberg, Thilo Sprenger

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anne KauffelsDepartment of General, Visceral, Thoracic, Transplant and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital of Giessen, Rudolf- Buchheim-Str. 7, 35392, Giessen, Germany.
Martin ReichertDepartment of General, Visceral, Thoracic, Transplant and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital of Giessen, Rudolf- Buchheim-Str. 7, 35392, Giessen, Germany.
Ingolf AskevoldDepartment of General, Visceral, Thoracic, Transplant and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital of Giessen, Rudolf- Buchheim-Str. 7, 35392, Giessen, Germany.
Anna BenderDepartment of General, Visceral, Thoracic, Transplant and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital of Giessen, Rudolf- Buchheim-Str. 7, 35392, Giessen, Germany.
Andreas HeckerDepartment of General, Visceral, Thoracic, Transplant and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital of Giessen, Rudolf- Buchheim-Str. 7, 35392, Giessen, Germany.
Winfried PadbergDepartment of General, Visceral, Thoracic, Transplant and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital of Giessen, Rudolf- Buchheim-Str. 7, 35392, Giessen, Germany.
Thilo SprengerDepartment of General, Visceral, Thoracic, Transplant and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital of Giessen, Rudolf- Buchheim-Str. 7, 35392, Giessen, Germany. thilo.sprenger@chiru.med.uni-giessen.de.
Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of robotic systems in bariatric surgery has constantly increased over the last years. However, beside its technical advantages in morbidly obese patients the conclusive role of robotics in bariatric and metabolic surgery is still under controversial debate. This is an analysis of prospectively collected data of consecutive patients undergoing fully robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypasses (TR-RYGB) during the first year after implementation of a robotic bariatric program at a tertiary university hospital. All patients were operated by a previously untrained robotic but experienced laparoscopic bariatric surgeon using the daVinci Xi system (Intuitive Surgical, Sarl). Data recording included patient characteristics, operative and functional outcomes, complications and learning curves for surgeon and assistants. In total, 80 patients underwent primary or revisional robotic bariatric surgery. Seventy-two patients (90%) received a TR-RYGB. There were no major complications, re-interventions or readmissions. The overall complication rate was 2.5% (Clavien-Dindo grade I and II). The overall operation time was 140.7 ± 24.6 min and decreased significantly from the first to the last decade of procedures (procedure 1-10: 171.2 ± 26.3 min versus procedure 63-72: 116.0 ± 10.9 min, p < 0.0001). A stabilization of the learning curve was observed after 30 procedures for the surgeon and after five procedures for the bedside assistant. With immediate effect, TR-RYGB is a safe procedure with low complication rates for an experienced laparoscopic bariatric surgeon without prior robotic skills. Learning curves are steep and operation times can be effectively decreased by increasing the experience of the surgeon.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryGastric BypassLaparoscopyObesity, MorbidRobotic Surgical ProceduresHumansLearning CurveRetrospective StudiesTertiary Care CentersTreatment OutcomeLearning curveRobotic surgeryRoux-en-Y gastric bypass

Identifiers

PMID35994194
PMCPMC10076403
OpenAlexW4292595861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.