SynthesisInternational journal of clinical oncology2022
Clinical outcomes of brain metastasectomy from soft tissue and bone sarcomas: a systematic review.
Synthesis in International journal of clinical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBrain metastasis in sarcomas is associated with a poor prognosis. Data regarding prognostic factors and clinical outcomes of surgical resection of brain metastasis from sarcomas are limited. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate survival outcomes post-brain metastasectomy for patients with soft tissue and bone sarcomas.
methodsA systematic review was conducted examining survival outcomes among adults and children with soft tissue and bone sarcoma undergoing brain metastasectomy, in the English language from inception up to May 31, 2021. Two reviewers independently evaluated and screened the literature, extracted the data, and graded the included studies. The body of evidence was evaluated and graded according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale for Cohort Studies and the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Case Series. Results were synthesized using descriptive methods. A meta-analysis was not possible due to the low quality and heterogeneity of studies.
resultsTen studies published between 1994 and 2020 were included: three were retrospective cohort studies and seven were case series. 507 patients were included, of whom 269 underwent brain metastasectomy. The median follow-up period ranged between 14 and 29 months. The median survival period after metastasectomy ranged from 7 to 25 months. The most common prognostic factors associated with survival included presenting performance status, age, number of brain metastases, presence of lung metastases, and peri-operative radiation therapy administration. DISCUSSION: Although the level of evidence is low, retrospective studies support that brain metastasectomy can be performed with reasonable post-operative survival in selected individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.