Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35994169›Full record

ArticleNMR in biomedicine2023

Comparison of two types of microscopic diffusion anisotropy in mouse brain.

Jens H Jensen, Josh Voltin, Xingju Nie, Siddhartha Dhiman, Emile T McKinnon, Maria F Falangola

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NMR in biomedicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jens H JensenCenter for Biomedical Imaging, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3219-4287
Josh VoltinCenter for Biomedical Imaging, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Xingju NieCenter for Biomedical Imaging, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4247-8945
Siddhartha DhimanDepartment of Neuroscience, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Emile T McKinnonDepartment of Neuroscience, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Maria F FalangolaCenter for Biomedical Imaging, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6349-7734
Medical University of South Carolina · US

Funding

Quantitative Neuroimaging Assessment of White Matter Integrity in the Context of Aging and ADR01AG054159 · NIA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI Andreana Benitez · 2017 to 2026
$8.9M
Assessing Brain Microstructure in Alzheimer's Disease with Advanced Diffusion MRIRF1AG057602 · NIA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI FALANGOLA, MARIA F, JENSEN, JENS H · 2018 to 2018
$2.1M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG054159NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG057602
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two distinct types of microscopic diffusion anisotropy (MA) are compared in brain for both normal control and transgenic (3xTg-AD) mice, which develop Alzheimer's disease pathology. The first type of MA is the commonly used microscopic fractional anisotropy (μFA), and the second is a new MA measure referred to as μFA'. These two MA parameters have different symmetry properties that are central to their physical interpretations. Specifically, μFA is invariant with respect to local rotations of compartmental diffusion tensors while μFA' is invariant with respect to global diffusion tensor deformations. A key distinction between μFA and μFA' is that μFA is affected by the same type of orientationally coherent diffusion anisotropy as the conventional fractional anisotropy (FA) while μFA' is not. Furthermore, μFA can be viewed as having independent contributions from FA and μFA', as is quantified by an equation relating all three anisotropies. The normal control and transgenic mice are studied at ages ranging from 2 to 15 months, with double diffusion encoding MRI being used to estimate μFA and μFA'. μFA and μFA' are nearly identical in low FA brain regions, but they show notable differences when FA is large. In particular, μFA and FA are found to be strongly correlated in the fimbria, but μFA' and FA are not. In addition, both μFA and μFA' are seen to increase with age in the corpus callosum and external capsule, and modest differences between normal control and transgenic mice are observed for μFA and μFA' in the corpus callosum and for μFA in the fimbria. The triad of FA, μFA, and μFA' is proposed as a useful combination of parameters for assessing diffusion anisotropy in brain.

Indexed as

AnimalsMice3xTg-ADAlzheimer's diseasedouble diffusion encoding MRIfractional anisotropymicroscopic anisotropymouse brain

Identifiers

PMID35994169
PMCPMC9742172
OpenAlexW4292623443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.