ArticleNMR in biomedicine2023
Comparison of two types of microscopic diffusion anisotropy in mouse brain.
Article in NMR in biomedicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Linear rotationally invariant kurtosis measures from double diffusion encoding MRI.Magnetic resonance imaging · 2025Article
- Diffusion MRI in 2-Month-Old Mouse Brain Predicts Alzheimer's Pathology Genotype.NMR in biomedicine · 2025Article
- Identification of diffusion, kurtosis, and propagator MRI markers of Alzheimer's disease pathology in post-mortem human tissue.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Two distinct types of microscopic diffusion anisotropy (MA) are compared in brain for both normal control and transgenic (3xTg-AD) mice, which develop Alzheimer's disease pathology. The first type of MA is the commonly used microscopic fractional anisotropy (μFA), and the second is a new MA measure referred to as μFA'. These two MA parameters have different symmetry properties that are central to their physical interpretations. Specifically, μFA is invariant with respect to local rotations of compartmental diffusion tensors while μFA' is invariant with respect to global diffusion tensor deformations. A key distinction between μFA and μFA' is that μFA is affected by the same type of orientationally coherent diffusion anisotropy as the conventional fractional anisotropy (FA) while μFA' is not. Furthermore, μFA can be viewed as having independent contributions from FA and μFA', as is quantified by an equation relating all three anisotropies. The normal control and transgenic mice are studied at ages ranging from 2 to 15 months, with double diffusion encoding MRI being used to estimate μFA and μFA'. μFA and μFA' are nearly identical in low FA brain regions, but they show notable differences when FA is large. In particular, μFA and FA are found to be strongly correlated in the fimbria, but μFA' and FA are not. In addition, both μFA and μFA' are seen to increase with age in the corpus callosum and external capsule, and modest differences between normal control and transgenic mice are observed for μFA and μFA' in the corpus callosum and for μFA in the fimbria. The triad of FA, μFA, and μFA' is proposed as a useful combination of parameters for assessing diffusion anisotropy in brain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.