ArticleUrolithiasis2022
How useful is an oral calcium load test for diagnosing recurrent calcium stone formers?
Article in Urolithiasis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Application of Nanomaterials in Kidney Stone Disease: Emerging Strategies for Early Diagnosis, Targeted Therapy, and Prevention.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Metabolic Acidosis in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: Diagnosis, Pathogenesis, and Treatment-A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Improving the diagnostic of absorptive hypercalciuria: a comparative analysis of calcium load tests at 2-hour and 4-hour intervals.Clinical kidney journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hypercalciuria is the main risk factor for recurrent calcium urolithiasis. The goal of our study is to determinate how useful an oral calcium load test is for stone formers to classify different forms of hypercalciuria in pathogenetic categories defined as renal or absorptive according to the current knowledge. Between June 2013 and February 2016, a prospective study was carried out on 117 documented recurrent hypercalciuric stone formers undergoing an oral calcium load test modified from the original description by Pak. After 2 days of calcium-restricted diet, urine and blood were analyzed at baseline and 120 min after receiving orally 1 g of calcium. Total and ionized calcium, parathyroid hormone from serum and urine calcium and creatinine were assessed in order to divide patients in three groups as previously described: resorptive, absorptive, and renal hypercalciuria. This allowed the identification of 19, 39, 34 and 33 patients with normocalcemic primary hyperparathyroidism (NPHPT), renal hypercalciuria aka renal calcium leak (RCL), absorptive hypercalciuria (AH) and unidentified cause, respectively. Patients with NPHPT (who required parathyroidectomy) experienced a lower PTH decrease (41.41 ± 12.82 vs. 54.06 ± 13.84% p < 0.01), higher beta-crosslaps, as well as lower TmP/GFR and distal third radius bone mineral density. RCL resulted in increased fasting urine calcium-to-creatinine ratio (Uca/Cr), i.e., > 0.37 mmol/mmol), without hyperparathyroidism. AH was diagnosed by the presence of ΔUCa/Cr > 0.60 mmol/mmol between baseline and 120 min without any other anomaly. For all remaining patients, results were inconclusive due to the lack of sufficient increase in serum calcium or because the cause of lithogenesis could not be clearly identified. The oral calcium load test is useful in nearly 80% of patients by identifying the different forms of hypercalciuria causing urolithiasis and by guiding treatment, including parathyroid surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.