Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35994079›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2023

Preoperative joint line convergence angle correction is a key factor in optimising accuracy in varus knee correction osteotomy.

P Behrendt, R Akoto, I Bartels, G Thürig, H Fahlbusch, A Korthaus, D Dalos, M Hoffmann, K-H Frosch, M Krause

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Joint line and knee osteotomy.EFORT open reviews · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. The joint line convergence angle (JLCA) correlates with intra-articular arthritis.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

P BehrendtDepartment of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Asklepios St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5282-0233
R AkotoDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Sports Traumatology, BG Hospital Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
I BartelsDepartment of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Asklepios St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany.
G ThürigDepartment of Traumatology, HFR Fribourg Hospital Cantonal, Fribourg, Switzerland.
H FahlbuschDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
A KorthausDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
D DalosDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
M HoffmannDepartment of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Asklepios St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany.
K-H FroschDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
M KrauseDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. m.krause@uke.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to identify and prevent preoperative factors that can be influenced in preoperative planning to reduce postoperative malcorrections.

methodsThe method used in this study was a retrospective two-centre analysis of 78 pre and postoperative fully weight-bearing radiographs of patients who underwent valgus osteotomy correction due to symptomatic medial compartment osteoarthritis. A computer software (TraumaCad

resultsIn 78 analysed cases, postoperative malcorrection was detected in 37.2% (5.1% undercorrection, 32.1% overcorrection). Linear regression analysis revealed preoperative body mass index (BMI, p = 0.04), JLCA (p = 0.0001), and osteotomy level divergence (p = 0.0005) as factors correlated with overcorrection. In a multiple regression analysis, JLCA and osteotomy level divergence remained significant factors. Preoperative JLCA correction reduced the planned osteotomy gap (A 9.7 ± 2.8 mm vs B 8.3 ± 2.4 mm; p > 0.05) and postoperative medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA: A 94.3 ± 2.1° vs B 92.3 ± 1.5°; p < .05) in patients with preoperative JLCA ≥ 4°. The results were validated using a virtual postoperative correction of cases with overcorrection. A case series (n = 8) with a preoperative JLCA > 4 revealed a postoperative accuracy using the JLCA correction of 3.4 ± 1.9%.

conclusionPreoperative JLCA ≥ 4° and tibial osteotomy level divergence were identified as risk factors for postoperative overcorrection. Preoperative JLCA correction using the formula JLCA-2/2 is proposed to better control ideal postoperative correction and reduce MPTA. The intraoperatively realised osteotomy level should be precisely in accordance with preoperative planning. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, cross-sectional study.

Indexed as

Osteoarthritis, KneeCross-Sectional StudiesHumansKnee JointOsteotomyRetrospective StudiesTibiaAccuracyHTOJLCAMPTAOsteotomyOvercorrectionPlanningVarus

Identifiers

PMID35994079
PMCPMC10049955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read42
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.