Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35993433›Full record

ReviewPhysiological reports2022

Cardiac impairments in postacute COVID-19 with sustained symptoms: A review of the literature and proof of concept.

Jyotpal Singh, Lanishen Bhagaloo, Eric Sy, Andrea J Lavoie, Payam Dehghani, Holly A Bardutz, Cameron S Mang, Josef Buttigieg, J Patrick Neary

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Physiological reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Cardiac function and posttraumatic stress disorder: a review of the literature and case report.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2023
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jyotpal SinghFaculty of Kinesiology and Health Studies, University of Regina, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3739-9364
Lanishen BhagalooGateway Alliance Medical, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Eric SyDepartment of Critical Care, Saskatchewan Health Authority, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5033-797X
Andrea J LavoieDepartment of Cardiology, Prairie Vascular Research Inc, Saskatchewan Health Authority, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Payam DehghaniDepartment of Cardiology, Prairie Vascular Research Inc, Saskatchewan Health Authority, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Holly A BardutzFaculty of Kinesiology and Health Studies, University of Regina, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Cameron S MangFaculty of Kinesiology and Health Studies, University of Regina, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Josef ButtigiegFaculty of Science, Department of Biology, University of Regina, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada.
J Patrick NearyFaculty of Kinesiology and Health Studies, University of Regina, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2480-8031
University of Regina · CASaskatchewan Health Authority · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although acute COVID-19 is known to cause cardiac damage in some cases, there is still much to learn about the duration and relative permanence of the damage that may occur. Long COVID is a condition that can occur when COVID-19 symptoms remain in the postviral acute period. Varying accounts of long COVID have been described across the literature, however, cardiac impairments are sustained in many individuals and cardiovascular assessment is now considered to be an expected follow-up examination. The purpose of this review and proof of concept is to summarize the current research related to the assessment of cardiac function, including echocardiography and blood biomarker data, during the follow-up period in patients who recovered from COVID-19. Following a literature review, it was found that right ventricular dysfunction along with global longitudinal strain and diastolic dysfunction are common findings. Finally, more severe acute myocardial injury during the index hospitalization appears to exacerbate cardiac function. The available literature implies that cardiac function must be monitored in patients recovered from COVID-19 who remain symptomatic and that the impairments and severity vary from person-to-person. The proof-of-concept analysis of patients with cardiac disease and respiratory disease in comparison to those with sustained symptoms from COVID-19 suggests elevated systolic time interval in those with sustained symptoms from COVID-19, thus reducing heart performance indices. Future research must consider the details of cardiac complications during the acute infection period and relate this to the cardiac function in patients with long COVID during mid- and long-term follow-up.

Indexed as

COVID-19Ventricular Dysfunction, RightEchocardiographyHumansPost-Acute COVID-19 SyndromeSystolediastolicechocardiographyglobal longitudinal strainlong COVIDright ventricle

Identifiers

PMID35993433
PMCPMC9393908
OpenAlexW4292601277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.