ArticleThe British journal of radiology2022
Is there any additional benefit of
Article in The British journal of radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Nuclear medicine imaging modalities to detect incidentalomas and their impact on patient management: a systematic review.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024Pooled it
- PSMA-Targeted Theranostics in Glioblastoma Multiforme: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Diagnostic accuracy of [Neuroradiology · 2026Article
- Review
- Comparison of 5-aminolevulinic acid and MMP-14 targeted peptide probes in preclinical models of GBM.Theranostics · 2025Article
- Comparative Analysis of Recurrent Glioblastoma Target Contours viaAdvances in radiation oncology · 2024Article
- Preferred Imaging for Target Volume Delineation for Radiotherapy of Recurrent Glioblastoma: A Literature Review of the Available Evidence.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the contribution of
methodsRT planning Computed Tomography (CT) images were fused separately with pre-operative MRI and PET/MRI images of 10 glioblastoma patients, retrospectively. The contrast-enhanced area in
resultsThe median GTV was 21,96 cc (1,04 - 82,04) and BTV was 25,58 cc (2,43 - 99,47). BTV was on average 47% larger than GTV which was statistically significant (
conclusionAltough BTV was larger than GTV, this significance was lost while we gave the same CTV margin including the peripheral edema. It seems that it may help to improve defining non-enhancing tumor part and also recurrent tumor volume. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Recent studies have focused on the role of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.