Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35993194›Full record

ArticleBioscience reports2022

Identification of key predictors of hospital mortality in critically ill patients with embolic stroke using machine learning.

Wei Liu, Wei Ma, Na Bai, Chunyan Li, Kuangpin Liu, Jinwei Yang, Sijia Zhang, Kewei Zhu, Qiang Zhou, Hua Liu and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioscience reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Development and validation of outcome prediction model for reperfusion therapy in acute ischemic stroke using nomogram and machine learning.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Wei Liu *Institute of Neuroscience, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Wei Ma *Institute of Neuroscience, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Na BaiDepartment of Neurology, The Third People's Hospital of Chengdu and The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Chunyan LiDepartment of Neurology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Kuangpin LiuInstitute of Neuroscience, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9613-5580
Jinwei YangSecond Department of General Surgery, First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Sijia ZhangInstitute of Neuroscience, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Kewei ZhuInstitute of Neuroscience, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Qiang ZhouDepartment of Neurology, The Third People's Hospital of Chengdu and The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Hua LiuDepartment of Neurology, The Third People's Hospital of Chengdu and The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Jianhui GuoSecond Department of General Surgery, First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Liyan LiInstitute of Neuroscience, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Embolic stroke (ES) is characterized by high morbidity and mortality. Its mortality predictors remain unclear. The present study aimed to use machine learning (ML) to identify the key predictors of mortality for ES patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). Data were extracted from two large ICU databases: Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV for training and internal validation, and eICU Collaborative Research Database (eICU-CRD) for external validation. We developed predictive models of ES mortality based on 15 ML algorithms. We relied on the synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE) to address class imbalance. Our main performance metric was area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC). We adopted recursive feature elimination (RFE) for feature selection. We assessed model performance using three disease-severity scoring systems as benchmarks. Of the 1566 and 207 ES patients enrolled in the two databases, there were 173 (15.70%), 73 (15.57%), and 36 (17.39%) hospital mortality in the training, internal validation, and external validation cohort, respectively. The random forest (RF) model had the largest AUROC (0.806) in the internal validation phase and was chosen as the best model. The AUROC of the RF compact (RF-COM) model containing the top six features identified by RFE was 0.795. In the external validation phase, the AUROC of the RF model was 0.838, and the RF-COM model was 0.830, outperforming other models. Our findings suggest that the RF model was the best model and the top six predictors of ES hospital mortality were Glasgow Coma Scale, white blood cell, blood urea nitrogen, bicarbonate, age, and mechanical ventilation.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessEmbolic StrokeHospital MortalityHumansIntensive Care UnitsMachine Learningfeature selectionmachine learningMIMIC-IVprediction modelrandom forest

Identifiers

PMID35993194
PMCPMC9484010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.