ArticleEvolution; international journal of organic evolution2022
Changing allometric relationships among fossil and Recent populations in two colonial species.
Article in Evolution; international journal of organic evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Allometry is vital for understanding the mechanisms underlying phenotypic evolution. Despite a large body of literature on allometry, studies based on fossil time series are limited for solitary organisms and nonexistent for colonial organisms. Allometric relationships have been found to be relatively constant across Recent populations of the same species, separated by space, but variable among fossil populations separated by thousands of years. How stable are allometric relationships at the module level for colonial organisms? We address this question using two extant species of the cheilostome bryozoan Microporella with fossil records spanning the Pleistocene of New Zealand. We investigate size covariation between feeding modules and three traits with separate functions (reproductive, resource uptake, and defense). We found that within-population (static) allometry can change on timescales of at least 0.1 million years. These within-population relationships do not consistently predict overintraspecific evolutionary allometry, which in turn does not predict those estimated at the genus level. Different functional traits are constrained to different extents by module size with defensive traits being the least constrained and most evolvable, compared with reproductive and resource uptake traits. Our study highlights the potential of colonial organisms in understanding the constraints and drivers of long-term phenotypic change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35993139What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.