ReviewJournal of food science and technology2022
Influence of pre-and post-harvest factors on the organoleptic and physicochemical quality of coffee: a short review.
Review in Journal of food science and technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Effect of Different Coffee Cherry Pulp-Retention Amounts on the Quality of Robusta Green Coffee Beans.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Multispectral and Colorimetric Approaches for Non-Destructive Maturity Assessment of Specialty Arabica Coffee.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Genetic Diversity and Disease Resistance Genes Profiling in CultivatedPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Development of Fermentation Strategies for Quality Mild Coffee Production (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Replacing traditional coffee appraisers with inductively coupled plasma - mass spectrometry (ICP-MS): From manual sensory evaluation to scientific analysis.Food chemistry: X · 2024Article
- Identification of SNP Markers and Candidate Genes Associated with Major Agronomic Traits inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of fatty acids in healthy and Aspergillus niger MH078571.1-infected Arabica coffee beans.PloS one · 2024Article
- The Determination of Triacylglycerols and Tocopherols Using UHPLC-CAD/FLD Methods for Assessing the Authenticity of Coffee Beans.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Quality Assessment of Ground Coffee Samples from Greek Market Using Various Instrumental Analytical Methods, In Silico Studies and Chemometrics.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The coffee quality is affected by 40% pre-harvest, 40% post-harvest, and 20% export handling. Besides, future risks for the coffee industry are related with climate change and increased pathogens. Considering the importance of the aroma profile and unique flavor of Arabica coffee, most literature focuses on this variety because of the high market share; however, nowadays, Robusta coffee stands out for its increasing industrial value and resistance to drought. In this review, both species are emphasized, highlighting sensory aspects of possible new products mixed with a higher proportion of Robusta given market trends for bitter beverages. In the present work, a systematic search of peer-reviewed literature evaluates how the coffee cup quality and physicochemical characteristics of Robusta and Arabica are influenced by environmental, agronomic, and further processing factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.