ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2022
Predicting response to tVNS in patients with migraine using functional MRI: A voxels-based machine learning analysis.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- 'Man vs. Machine: can ML algorithms diagnose headaches as accurately as clinicians? A systematic review.'Journal of neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Imaging the brain and vascular reactions to headache treatments: a systematic review.The journal of headache and pain · 2023Pooled it
- Acupuncture for Migraine Without Aura and Connection-Based Efficacy Prediction: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2026Trial
- Source-level α periodic power in visual and default mode networks predicts topiramate treatment response in migraine.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Article
- Treadmill exercise prevents stress-induced anxiety-like behaviors via enhancing the excitatory input from the primary motor cortex to the thalamocortical circuit.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Exploring potential neuroimaging biomarkers for the response to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in episodic migraine.The journal of headache and pain · 2024Article
- The Clinical Relevance of Artificial Intelligence in Migraine.Brain sciences · 2024Review
- Article
- Review
- Application of EEG in migraine.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Review
- A state-of-the-art review of functional magnetic resonance imaging technique integrated with advanced statistical modeling and machine learning for primary headache diagnosis.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Migraine is a common disorder, affecting many patients. However, for one thing, lacking objective biomarkers, misdiagnosis, and missed diagnosis happen occasionally. For another, though transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) could alleviate migraine symptoms, the individual difference of tVNS efficacy in migraineurs hamper the clinical application of tVNS. Therefore, it is necessary to identify biomarkers to discriminate migraineurs as well as select patients suitable for tVNS treatment. Methods: A total of 70 patients diagnosed with migraine without aura (MWoA) and 70 matched healthy controls were recruited to complete fMRI scanning. In study 1, the fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (fALFF) of each voxel was calculated, and the differences between healthy controls and MWoA were compared. Meaningful voxels were extracted as features for discriminating model construction by a support vector machine. The performance of the discriminating model was assessed by accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. In addition, a mask of these significant brain regions was generated for further analysis. Then, in study 2, 33 of the 70 patients with MWoA in study 1 receiving real tVNS were included to construct the predicting model in the generated mask. Discriminative features of the discriminating model in study 1 were used to predict the reduction of attack frequency after a 4-week tVNS treatment by support vector regression. A correlation coefficient between predicted value and actual value of the reduction of migraine attack frequency was conducted in 33 patients to assess the performance of predicting model after tVNS treatment. We vislized the distribution of the predictive voxels as well as investigated the association between fALFF change (post-per treatment) of predict weight brain regions and clinical outcomes (frequency of migraine attack) in the real group. Results: A biomarker containing 3,650 features was identified with an accuracy of 79.3%, sensitivity of 78.6%, and specificity of 80.0% ( Conclusions: By machine learning, the study proposed two potential biomarkers that could discriminate patients with MWoA and predict the efficacy of tVNS in reducing migraine attack frequency. The pivotal features were mainly located in the TCC/RVM, thalamus, mPFC, and temporal gyrus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.