ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
Percutaneous ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy for the diagnosis of cardiac tumors: Optimizing the treatment strategy for patients with intermural and pericardial cardiac tumors.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rare Presentation of a Primary Cardiac Mass: Insights Into Multimodal Imaging, Histopathology, and Surgical Management.JACC. Case reports · 2025Article
- A Review of Needle Navigation Technologies in Minimally Invasive Cardiovascular Surgeries-Toward a More Effective and Easy-to-Apply Process.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Case Report: Giant left atrial cystic tumor: myxoma or intracardiac blood cyst?Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Multimodality Imaging of Benign Primary Cardiac Tumor.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The aims of this study are to investigate the clinical value and practical safety of ultrasound-guided percutaneous core needle biopsy on diagnosing cardiac tumor and to discuss the treatment strategy for cardiac intermural and pericardial tumors. Methods: The clinical data were retrospectively collected for patients with intermural and pericardial cardiac tumors. The patients were divided into groups of surgical resection, surgical resection after obtaining pathological tissue by PUS-CNB, and/or radiotherapy according to the treatment modality. Ultrasound-guided aspiration biopsy was divided into cardiac tumor biopsy and extracardiac lesion biopsy according to patient conditions. The surgical time was recorded, and the safety and clinical application value of PUS-CNB for the diagnosis of cardiac tumors were evaluated in terms of complications and satisfaction with pathological sampling. Results: A total of 18 patient cases were collected, and PUS-CNB of cardiac tumors was performed in 8 cases, with sampling times averaging 15.6 ± 3.0 min. Four cases of cardiac tumors combined with extracardiac tumors were biopsied, with puncture times averaging 13.0 ± 2.9 min. All 12 biopsied patients had no postoperative complications. Except for 1 failed biopsy, the biopsies were successful and the pathological results were consistent with the clinical diagnosis with a satisfaction rate of 91.7%. Except for two cases of surgical resection, the rest were considered for conservative treatment. Surgical resection and/or biopsy were performed in six cases, and two cases were aggravated after surgery. The final pathology of all 17 cardiac tumors was malignant. Conclusion: PUS-CNB is safe and effective, providing a simple and undemanding method for accurate diagnosis of cardiac intermural and pericardial tumors while avoiding unnecessary open-heart surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.