Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35992816›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Sex-specific differences in immunogenomic features of response to immune checkpoint blockade.

Susan C Scott, Xiaoshan M Shao, Noushin Niknafs, Archana Balan, Gavin Pereira, Kristen A Marrone, Vincent K Lam, Joseph C Murray, Josephine L Feliciano, Benjamin P Levy and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Single-cell multiomics identifies an ALDH9A1-carnitine signaling axis driving resistance of NSCLC to immunotherapy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Sex Differences in Colorectal Tumor-Associated T-cell Responses.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Susan C ScottThe Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Xiaoshan M ShaoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Noushin NiknafsThe Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Archana BalanThe Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Gavin PereiraThe Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Kristen A MarroneThe Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Vincent K LamThe Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Joseph C MurrayThe Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Josephine L FelicianoThe Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Benjamin P LevyThe Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
David S EttingerThe Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Christine L HannThe Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Julie R BrahmerThe Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Patrick M FordeThe Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Rachel KarchinThe Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Jarushka NaidooThe Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Valsamo AnagnostouThe Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.

Funding

Sex differences in the impact of frailty on vaccine-induced immune responses in community-dwelling older adultsU54AG062333 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI KLEIN, SABRA L. · 2018 to 2022
$8.9M
NIA NIH HHS U54 AG062333
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The magnitude of response to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy may be sex-dependent, as females have lower response rates and decreased survival after ICI monotherapy. The mechanisms underlying this sex dimorphism in ICI response are unknown, and may be related to sex-driven differences in the immunogenomic landscape of tumors that shape anti-tumor immune responses in the context of therapy. Methods: To investigate the association of immunogenic mutations with HLA haplotypes, we leveraged whole exome sequence data and HLA genotypes from 482 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tumors from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). To explore sex-specific genomic features linked with ICI response, we analyzed whole exome sequence data from patients with NSCLC treated with ICI. Tumor mutational burden (TMB), HLA class I and II restricted immunogenic missense mutation (IMM) load, and mutational smoking signature were defined for each tumor. IMM load was combined with HLA class I and II haplotypes and correlated with therapeutic response and survival following ICI treatment. We examined rates of durable clinical benefit (DCB) for at least six months from ICI treatment initiation. Findings were validated utilizing whole exome sequence data from an independent cohort of ICI treated NSCLC. Results: Analysis of whole exome sequence data from NSCLC tumors of females and males revealed that germline HLA class II diversity (≥9 unique HLA alleles) was associated with higher tumor class II IMM load in females (p=0.01) and not in males (p=0.64). Similarly, in tumors of female patients, somatic HLA class II loss of heterozygosity was associated with increased IMM load (p=0.01) while this association was not observed in tumors in males (p=0.20). In females, TMB (p=0.005), class I IMM load (p=0.005), class II IMM load (p=0.004), and mutational smoking signature (p<0.001) were significantly higher in tumors responding to ICI as compared to non-responding tumors. In contrast, among males, there was no significant association between DCB and any of these features. When IMM was considered in the context of HLA zygosity, high MHC-II restricted IMM load and high HLA class II diversity was significantly associated with overall survival in males (p=0.017). Conclusions: Inherent sex-driven differences in immune surveillance affect the immunogenomic determinants of response to ICI and likely mediate the dimorphic outcomes with ICI therapy. Deeper understanding of the selective pressures and mechanisms of immune escape in tumors in males and females can inform patient selection strategies and can be utilized to further hone immunotherapy approaches in cancer.

Indexed as

cancer genomicsHLA zygosityimmunotherapylung cancersex dimorphism

Identifiers

PMID35992816
PMCPMC9382103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.