Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35992808›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2022

BTK, the new kid on the (oncology) block?

Emanuela Grassilli, Maria Grazia Cerrito, Marialuisa Lavitrano

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emanuela GrassilliLaboratory of Molecular Medicine, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Maria Grazia CerritoLaboratory of Molecular Medicine, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Marialuisa LavitranoLaboratory of Molecular Medicine, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
University of Milano-Bicocca · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last decade data piled up indicating that BTK - for twenty years considered as a "private matter" of bone marrow-derived cells - it is expressed and plays important and different roles also outside of the hematopoietic compartment and, most notably, in tumor cells. Initial evidence that BTK plays a critical role in B cell-derived malignancies prompted the chase for specific inhibitors, the forefather of which entered the clinic in a record time and paved the way for an ever increasing number of new molecules to be trialed. The growing interests in BTK also led to the discovery that, in solid tumors, two novel isoforms are mainly expressed and actionable liabilities for target therapy. Remarkably, the different isoforms appear to be involved in different signaling pathways which will have to be attentively specified in order to define the area of therapeutic intervention. In this perspective we briefly summarize the progress made in the last decade in studying BTK and its isoforms in cancer cells and define the open questions to be addressed in order to get the most benefits from its targeting for therapeutic purposes.

Indexed as

B-cell leukemiaBTKBTK-ABTK-Cp65BTKsolid tumors

Identifiers

PMID35992808
PMCPMC9386470
OpenAlexW4289745059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.