ArticleSN business & economics2022
Impact of government interventions on the stock market during COVID-19: a case study in Indonesia.
Article in SN business & economics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper aims to examine the short-term impact of government interventions on 11 industrial sectors in the Indonesian Stock Exchange (IDX) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Whereas earlier studies have widely investigated the impact of government interventions on the financial markets during the pandemic, there is lack of research on analysing the financial impacts of various interventions in different industrial sectors, particularly in Indonesia. In this research, five key types of government interventions are selected amid the pandemic from March 2020 to July 2021, including economic stimulus packages, jobs creation law, Jakarta lockdowns, Ramadan travel restrictions, and free vaccination campaign. Based on an event study methodology, the research reveals that the first economic stimulus package was critical in reviving most sectors following the announcement of the first COVID-19 case in Indonesia. Jakarta lockdowns impacted stock returns negatively in most sectors, but the impacts were relatively insignificant in comparison to other countries in the region. The recurrence of lockdowns in Jakarta had a minor detrimental impact, showing that the market had acclimated to the new normal caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Additionally, Ramadan travel restrictions caused minor negative impacts on the stock market. Furthermore, the second Ramadan travel restrictions generated a significant reaction from the technology sector. Finally, while free vaccination campaign and job creation law did not significantly boost the stock market, both are believed to result in a positive long-term effect on the country's economy if appropriately executed. The findings are critical for investors, private companies, and governments to build on recovery action plans for major industrial sectors, allowing the stock market to bounce back quickly and efficiently. As this study limits its analysis to the short-term impact of individual interventions, future studies can examine long-term and combined effects of interventions which could also help policy makers to form effective portfolios of interventions in the event of a pandemic. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43546-022-00312-4.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.