Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35992567›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2022

Analysis of Peripapillary Intrachoroidal Cavitation and Myopic Peripapillary Distortions in Polar Regions by Optical Coherence Tomography.

Adèle Ehongo, Noélie Bacq, Nacima Kisma, Artemise Dugauquier, Yassir Alaoui Mhammedi, Kevin Coppens, Françoise Bremer, Karelle Leroy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Peripapillary intrachoroidal cavitation in myopic eyes with open-angle glaucoma: association with myopic fundus changes.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Peripapillary Intrachoroidal Cavitation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Myopic (Peri)papillary Changes and Visual Field Defects.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Adèle EhongoOphthalmology Department, Erasmus Hospital, Brussels, 1070, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-6796-2779
Noélie BacqOphthalmology Department, Erasmus Hospital, Brussels, 1070, Belgium.
Nacima KismaOphthalmology Department, Erasmus Hospital, Brussels, 1070, Belgium.
Artemise DugauquierOphthalmology Department, Erasmus Hospital, Brussels, 1070, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-0282-4719
Yassir Alaoui MhammediOphthalmology Department, Erasmus Hospital, Brussels, 1070, Belgium.
Kevin CoppensStatistician, Cosma Consulting, Enghien 7850, Belgium.
Françoise BremerOphthalmology Department, Erasmus Hospital, Brussels, 1070, Belgium.
Karelle LeroyHistology Department, Erasmus Campus, CP 620, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, 1070, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-8661-5262

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the peripapillary polar characteristics in eyes combining peripapillary staphyloma and gamma peripapillary atrophy according to whether peripapillary intrachoroidal cavitation (PICC) was present or absent (combination-group). Patients and methods: This prospective non-interventional cross-sectional study included 667 eyes of 334 subjects. From the polar peripapillary regions to the opening of Bruch's membrane, the following elements and their topographic relationships were analyzed using optical coherence tomography sections: configuration of the posterior curvature of the choroid, visibility of the subarachnoid space (SAS), and suprachoroidal detachment (SCD). Chi-squared and Fisher exact tests were used for statistical analysis. Results: The protrusion of the posterior choroidal wall, with anterior elevation on either side, observed in both groups progressed and transformed into a wedge-shaped deformity on the side of gamma peripapillary atrophy. This wedge configuration was significantly more frequent in PICC-group than in combination-group (p = 0.004 and p < 0.001) for the upper and lower poles, respectively. SAS was more frequently observed in PICC-group than in combination-group (p = 0.002 and p < 0.001) for the upper and lower poles, respectively. SCD was detected exclusively in PICC-group (p < 0.001, both poles). The wedge-shaped configuration and the SCD were aligned antero-posteriorly with the SAS. Conclusion: We confirmed that PICC is an SCD. We observed its constant alignment with the SAS. We suggest that the tensile forces of the optic nerve sheaths during adduction promote the collapse of the scleral flange onto the SAS, leading to PICC. Further studies are warranted to confirm this hypothesis.

Indexed as

gamma peripapillary atrophymyopic complicationsperipapillary intrachoroidal cavitationstaphylomasubarachnoid spacesuprachoroidal detachment

Identifiers

PMID35992567
PMCPMC9387167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.