Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35992503›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of exercise science2022

Development of a Standard Push-up Scale for College-Aged Females.

Melanie M Adams, Sophie A Hatch, Elizabeth G Winsor, Caitlyn Parmelee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of exercise science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Melanie M AdamsDepartment of Human Performance & Movement Sciences, Keene State College, Keene, NH, USA.
Sophie A HatchDepartment of Human Performance & Movement Sciences, Keene State College, Keene, NH, USA.
Elizabeth G WinsorDepartment of Human Performance & Movement Sciences, Keene State College, Keene, NH, USA.
Caitlyn ParmeleeDepartment of Mathematics, Keene State College, Keene, NH, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ACSM/CESP push-up test exemplifies the limiting nature of the gender binary in fitness. Males perform the standard push-up (from toes) while females perform the modified push-up (from knees), even if capable of multiple standard push-ups. Differences in upper body strength are used to justify the test protocol. Though the load difference between modified and standard positions is substantially less than the gender strength gap. Additionally, current fitness ratings are over 30 years old. The purpose of this study was to develop a new standard push-up rating scale for college-age females. Cis-female college students (

Indexed as

fitness testinggenderPush-up teststereotype

Identifiers

PMID35992503
PMCPMC9362895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.