Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35992463›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2022

The Role of Positive and Negative Information Processing in COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake in Women of Generation X, Y, and Z: The Power of Good is Stronger Than Bad in Youngsters?

Eszter Eniko Marschalko, Kinga Szabo, Ibolya Kotta, Kinga Kalcza-Janosi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eszter Eniko MarschalkoApplied Psychology Department, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Kinga SzaboApplied Psychology Department, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Ibolya KottaApplied Psychology Department, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Kinga Kalcza-JanosiApplied Psychology Department, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Positive and negative focus in information processing associated with age has a diverse role in COVID-19 vaccine uptake. The aim of the study was the exploration of the generational diversity among psychological predictors of COVID-19 vaccine uptake. Methods: A cross-sectional research was conducted. The sample included 978 Hungarian women. Based on former literature findings, the COVID-19 vaccine uptake predictors were chosen from the health beliefs model, COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, and psychological flexibility. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to investigate the predictors of COVID-19 vaccine uptake in women of Gen X, Gen Y, and Gen Z. Results: In Gen X women, the influence of significant predictors are more prone to the positivity in COVID-19 vaccine uptake behavior, Conclusion: Women belonging to Gen X or Gen Y, the

Indexed as

cognitiongenerational identityhealthhealth belief modelpsychological flexibilityvaccine hesitancyvaccine uptakewomen

Identifiers

PMID35992463
PMCPMC9389232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.