Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35992455›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychology2022

COVID Academic Pandemic: Techno Stress Faced by Teaching Staff for Online Academic Activities.

Mao Zheng, Muhammad Asif, Muhammad Shahid Tufail, Saira Naseer, Shahid Ghafoor Khokhar, Xiding Chen, Rana Tahir Naveed

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Barriers and Facilitators to Participation in Interventions for Employee Health and Wellbeing in the University Context.Stress and health : journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mao ZhengFaculty of Business Administration, School of Business Administration, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu, China.
Muhammad AsifDivision of Management and Administrative Sciences, University of Education (UE) Business School, University of Education, Lahore, Pakistan.
Muhammad Shahid TufailDivision of Management and Administrative Sciences, University of Education (UE) Business School, University of Education, Lahore, Pakistan.
Saira NaseerSchool of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, China.
Shahid Ghafoor KhokharDivision of Management and Administrative Sciences, University of Education (UE) Business School, University of Education, Lahore, Pakistan.
Xiding ChenSchool of Finance and Trade, Wenzhou Business College, Wenzhou, China.
Rana Tahir NaveedDivision of Management and Administrative Sciences, University of Education (UE) Business School, University of Education, Lahore, Pakistan.
University of Education · PKNanjing University of Science and Technology · CNSouthwestern University of Finance and Economics · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper analyzes the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of the teachers, specifically the techno stress arising in them as a result of issues faced by them in the use of technology when they conduct the online academic activities. It aims to assess the major factors related to the online teaching that specifically adds to techno stress on the teachers during the COVID-19 outbreak. Finally, the study aims to provide suggestions to the policymakers and the management of the universities so that the effect of the COVID-19's on teachers' mental health and the related techno stress can be reduced. This paper is a literature review of the articles on the notion of techno stress on teachers and their mental health by searching the related articles with these terminologies using the renowned search engines of Google Scholar and Web of Science. A combination of the terms such as Coronavirus, COVID-19, mental health, psychological distress, techno stress, and online teaching were used in the article search for the review. The literature has suggested that the COVID-19 outbreak has significantly affected the mental health of the employees in general and specifically, the teachers who are engaged in online academic activities and teaching in the universities. The paper has identified a few factors that are the cause of the techno stress and provides recommendations for the university management and the policy makers for minimizing their negative impact on the teachers, in terms of the techno stress and their mental health. Coronavirus is a new strain of the viruses that has badly engulfed the entire population of the world. It is even now badly rising and causing deaths while this article is in the writing phase. The article has addressed the mental health concerns of the university teachers as they are now working from home using ICT for delivering the lectures and conducting the online teaching and learning activities for the students at their universities. This is a matter of grave importance now and requires immediate attention. Hence, this article broadens the scope of the research on the corona virus and its impact on the university teachers.

Indexed as

coronavirusCOVID-19mental healthonline teachingpsychological distresstechno stressuniversity teachers

Identifiers

PMID35992455
PMCPMC9384887
OpenAlexW4288080771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.