Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35992426›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2022

The Italian telephone-based Verbal Fluency Battery (t-VFB): standardization and preliminary clinical usability evidence.

Edoardo Nicolò Aiello, Alice Naomi Preti, Veronica Pucci, Lorenzo Diana, Alessia Corvaglia, Chiara Barattieri di San Pietro, Teresa Difonzo, Stefano Zago, Ildebrando Appollonio, Sara Mondini and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Telephone-based cognitive screening in neurodegenerative MCI and dementia: preliminary findings from the TBCS Study.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Article
  3. The remote administration of the uniform data set neuropsychological test battery (I-UDSNB) Italian version: normative data.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Psychometrics and diagnostics of the Italian version of the Alternate Verbal Fluency Battery (AVFB) in non-demented Parkinson's disease patients.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Article
  6. A digital teleneuropsychology platform for the diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment: from concept to certification as a medical device.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Article
  7. The Telephone Language Screener (TLS): standardization of a novel telephone-based screening test for language impairment.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Edoardo Nicolò AielloPh.D. Program in Neuroscience, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Alice Naomi PretiFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Veronica PucciDepartment of Philosophy, Sociology, Pedagogy and Applied Psychology, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.
Lorenzo DianaNeuropsychological Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy.
Alessia CorvagliaDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences Luigi Sacco, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Chiara Barattieri di San PietroDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Teresa DifonzoFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Stefano ZagoFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Ildebrando AppollonioNeurology Section, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Sara MondiniDepartment of Philosophy, Sociology, Pedagogy and Applied Psychology, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.
Nadia BologniniNeuropsychological Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study aimed at standardizing and providing preliminary evidence on the clinical usability of the Italian telephone-based Verbal Fluency Battery (t-VFB), which includes phonemic (t-PVF), semantic (t-SVF) and alternate (t-AVF) verbal fluency tasks. Methods: Three-hundred and thirty-five Italian healthy participants (HPs; 140 males; age Results: The majority of t-VFB scores correlated among each other and with the BDS, but not with the MMSE. Switch number correlated with t-PVF, t-SVF, t-AVF scores, whilst cluster size with the t-SVF and t-AVF scores only. The t-VFB was underpinned by a mono-component structure and was internally consistent (Cronbach's α = 0.91). Test-retest (ICC = 0.69-0.95) and inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.98-1) were optimal. Each t-VFB test was statistically equivalent to its in-person version (equivalence bounds yielding a Discussion: The t-VFB is a valid, reliable and normed telephone-based assessment tool for language and executive functioning, equivalent to the in-person version; results show promising evidence of its diagnostic accuracy in neurological populations.

Indexed as

executive functioninglanguagetele-neuropsychologytelephone-basedverbal fluency

Identifiers

PMID35992426
PMCPMC9384842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.