ArticleSoft computing2022
Penalized logistic regressions with technical indicators predict up and down trends.
Article in Soft computing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fast binary logistic regression.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Correctly predicting up and down trends for stock prices is of immense important in the financial market. To further improve the prediction performance, in this paper we introduce five penalties: ridge, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, elastic net, smoothly clipped absolute deviation and minimax concave penalty to logistic regressions with 19 technical indicators, and propose the five penalized logistic regressions to predict up and down trends for stock prices. Firstly, we translate the five penalized logistic log-likelihood functions into the five penalized weighted least squares functions and combine them with the tenfold cross-validation method to calculate the solution path to parameter estimators. Secondly, we combine the binomial deviation with cross-validation error as a risk measure to choose an appropriate tuning parameter for the penalty functions and apply the training set and the coordinate descent algorithm to obtain parameter estimators and probability estimators. Thirdly, we employ the testing set and the chosen optimal thresholds to construct two-class confusion matrices and receiver operating characteristic curves to assess the prediction performances to the five regressions. Finally, we compare the proposed five penalized logistic regressions with logistic regression, support vector machine and artificial neural network and found that the minimax concave penalty logistic regression performs the best in terms of the prediction performance to up and down trends for Google's stock prices. Therefore, in this paper we propose the five new prediction methods to improve the prediction accuracy of stock returns and bring economic benefits for investors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.