Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35992170›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2022

Bactericidal and anti-biofilm effects of uncharged and cationic ultrasound-responsive nitric oxide microbubbles on

Gareth LuTheryn, Charlotte Hind, Christopher Campbell, Aaron Crowther, Qiang Wu, Sara B Keller, Peter Glynne-Jones, J Mark Sutton, Jeremy S Webb, Michael Gray and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Biofilm · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gareth LuTherynUniversity College London (UCL) School of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutics, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Charlotte HindHealthcare Biotechnology, United Kingdom Health Security Agency (UKHSA), Porton Down, Salisbury, United Kingdom.
Christopher CampbellFaculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Aaron CrowtherUniversity College London (UCL) School of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutics, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Qiang WuInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Sara B KellerInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Peter Glynne-JonesFaculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
J Mark SuttonHealthcare Biotechnology, United Kingdom Health Security Agency (UKHSA), Porton Down, Salisbury, United Kingdom.
Jeremy S WebbSchool of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, National Biofilms Innovation Centre (NBIC) and Institute for Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Michael GrayInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Sandra A WilksSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Eleanor StrideInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Dario CarugoUniversity College London (UCL) School of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutics, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
University of Oxford · GBUniversity of Southampton · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial biofilms are a major and ongoing concern for public health, featuring both inherited genetic resistance traits and a conferred innate tolerance to traditional antibiotic therapies. Consequently, there is a growing need for novel methods of drug delivery, to increase the efficacy of antimicrobial agents. This research evaluated the anti-biofilm and bactericidal effects of ultrasound responsive gas-microbubbles (MBs) of either air or nitric oxide, using an

Indexed as

Nitric OxidePseudomonas aeruginosaAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiofilmsCationsMicrobubblesAnti-Bacterial AgentsCationsNitric Oxideantimicrobialbiofilmschronic woundsmicrobubble (MB)nitric oxide (NO)sonobactericideultrasound

Identifiers

PMID35992170
PMCPMC9386126
OpenAlexW4289731284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.