ArticleiScience2022
Doppelgänger spotting in biomedical gene expression data.
Article in iScience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Detecting and mitigating doppelgänger bias in microbiome data: impacts on machine learning and disease classification.Gut microbes · 2025Article
- Exploiting the similarity of dissimilarities for biomedical applications and enhanced machine learning.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Protocol to identify functional doppelgängers and verify biomedical gene expression data using doppelgangerIdentifier.STAR protocols · 2022Article
- Perspectives for better batch effect correction in mass-spectrometry-based proteomics.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Doppelgänger effects (DEs) occur when samples exhibit chance similarities such that, when split across training and validation sets, inflates the trained machine learning (ML) model performance. This inflationary effect causes misleading confidence on the deployability of the model. Thus, so far, there are no tools for doppelgänger identification or standard practices to manage their confounding implications. We present
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.