ArticleScanning2022
Application of MRI and CT Images in Surgical Treatment of Early Cervical Cancer.
Article in Scanning, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-06-21Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Human Subject Welfare · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Lack of IRB/IACUC Approval and/or Compliance · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In order to understand the problems of the application of MRI and CT images in the early cervical cancer surgery, a method that the application of MRI imaging and CT images in early cervical cancer surgery was proposed. For the cervical cancer in clinical practice, the applications of the modern imaging examination and the clinical staging classification were investigated and analyzed. Compared with the surgical pathology results, the application value of common modern imaging in clinical staging of cervical cancer was evaluated. It was found that the sensitivity of MRI and CT in diagnosing lymph node metastasis was 56% and 58%, and the specificity was 93% and 92%, respectively. The experiment proved the application value of MRI and CT in clinical staging of cervical cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.