Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35992040›Full record

ArticleComputational statistics & data analysis2022

Group linear non-Gaussian component analysis with applications to neuroimaging.

Yuxuan Zhao, David S Matteson, Stewart H Mostofsky, Mary Beth Nebel, Benjamin B Risk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational statistics & data analysis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Independent Filter Analysis for Group Discrimination in fMRI.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yuxuan ZhaoDepartment of Statistics and Data Science, Cornell University, United States of America.
David S MattesonDepartment of Statistics and Data Science, Cornell University, United States of America.
Stewart H MostofskyCenter for Neurodevelopmental and Imaging Research, Kennedy Krieger Institute, United States of America.
Mary Beth NebelCenter for Neurodevelopmental and Imaging Research, Kennedy Krieger Institute, United States of America.
Benjamin B RiskDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, United States of America.

Funding

TR&D 4: Algorithms for functional and anatomical brain analysisP41EB015909 · NIBIB · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI VAN ZIJL, PETER CM · 2012 to 2020
$13.1M
Sleep and Circadian Dysfunction, Brain and Neurobehavioral Development in AutismP50HD103538 · NICHD · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI S. Ali Fatemi, Bradley L Schlaggar · 2020 to 2026
$9.9M
Translational Neuroscience CoreU54HD079123 · NICHD · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI FATEMI, S. ALI, SCHLAGGAR, BRADLEY L · 2014 to 2019
$7.9M
Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR000424 · NCATS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FORD, DANIEL ERNEST · 2012 to 2012
$6.0M
Anomalous Motor Physiology In ADHDR01MH078160 · NIMH · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI MOSTOFSKY, STEWART H · 2006 to 2024
$5.8M
Motor Skill Learning in AutismR01NS048527 · NINDS · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI MOSTOFSKY, STEWART H · 2005 to 2012
$2.9M
Visual-Motor Development in Infants at High Risk for AutismK01MH109766 · NIMH · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI NEBEL, MARY BETH · 2016 to 2020
$753k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000424NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015909NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD103538NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD079123NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH109766NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH078160NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS048527
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Independent component analysis (ICA) is an unsupervised learning method popular in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Group ICA has been used to search for biomarkers in neurological disorders including autism spectrum disorder and dementia. However, current methods use a principal component analysis (PCA) step that may remove low-variance features. Linear non-Gaussian component analysis (LNGCA) enables simultaneous dimension reduction and feature estimation including low-variance features in single-subject fMRI. A group LNGCA model is proposed to extract group components shared by more than one subject. Unlike group ICA methods, this novel approach also estimates individual (subject-specific) components orthogonal to the group components. To determine the total number of components in each subject, a parametric resampling test is proposed that samples spatially correlated Gaussian noise to match the spatial dependence observed in data. In simulations, estimated group components achieve higher accuracy compared to group ICA. The method is applied to a resting-state fMRI study on autism spectrum disorder in 342 children (252 typically developing, 90 with autism), where the group signals include resting-state networks. The discovered group components appear to exhibit different levels of temporal engagement in autism versus typically developing children, as revealed using group LNGCA. This novel approach to matrix decomposition is a promising direction for feature detection in neuroimaging.

Indexed as

Big data(fMRI)Functional magnetic resonance imagingGroup inferenceIndependent component analysis (ICA)Matrix decompositionPrincipal component analysisResting-state fMRI

Identifiers

PMID35992040
PMCPMC9390952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.