ArticleJournal of hip preservation surgery2022
Comparison of modern periacetabular osteotomy for hip dysplasia with total hip arthroplasty for hip osteoarthritis-10-year outcomes are comparable in young adult patients.
Article in Journal of hip preservation surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hip Dysplasia Treated With Periacetabular Osteotomy in Patients Over 40 Years Old: A Systematic Review.The Iowa orthopaedic journal · 2024Pooled it
- Patient-reported outcomes of transposition osteotomy of the acetabulum and contralateral total hip arthroplasty in patients with bilateral hip dysplasia.International orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Rethinking preservation: The case for timely hip arthroplasty in young adult hip pathology.Bulletin of the Hospital for Joint Disease (2013) · 2026Review
- Periacetabular osteotomy of the hip: an 8-year follow-up of 96 consecutive cases.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2026Article
- Impact of prior osteotomy and osteosynthesis on long-term outcomes after total hip arthroplasty : a 1:1 Mahalanobis distance-matched registry study of 5,392 patients.Bone & joint open · 2025Article
- Measuring Short-Term Outcomes Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Value-Based Healthcare Approach.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- What Are the Minimum Clinically Important Difference, Substantial Clinical Benefit, and Patient-Acceptable Symptom State Thresholds for the Modified Harris Hip Score and International Hip Outcome Tool 12 Among Patients Who Undergo Periacetabular Osteotomy?Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2025Article
- The Use of Combined Hip Arthroscopy and Periacetabular Osteotomy for Hip Dysplasia Is Increasing and Has Low Complication Rates.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2024Article
- A social media analysis of patient-perceived complications following periacetabular osteotomy (PAO): a retrospective observational study.BMC surgery · 2024Observational
- Total Hip Arthroplasty After Peri-Acetabular Osteotomy Results in Significant Improvement in Hip Function With Low Revision Rates at Mid-Term Follow-Up.The Iowa orthopaedic journal · 2024Article
- Long Covid - a cause of concern for surgical training.Journal of hip preservation surgery · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Young adult patients with symptomatic acetabular dysplasia and marginal secondary osteoarthritis can be faced with the decision to either undergo periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) to relieve symptoms and slow osteoarthritis progression or wait until progression to more advanced disease and undergo total hip arthroplasty (THA). The decision can be difficult, and contemporary literature to guide these decisions is sparse. Therefore, we retrospectively assessed complication rate, survivorship and patient-reported clinical outcomes [modified Harris Hip score (mHHS), UCLA Activity score] in two, consecutive cohorts of patients aged 18-40 years that underwent either PAO for symptomatic acetabular dysplasia (mean age 28.9 years) or THA for advanced secondary osteoarthritis (32.5 years). PAO patients were followed for a mean of 10.5 years (8-19) and THA patients for 11.9 (8-17) years. Between PAO and THA groups, there were no differences in overall complication rate (4.7% versus 4.7%), non-revision reoperation rate (5.9% versus 2.3%,
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.