ArticleBiomedical optics express2022
Leveraging non-expert crowdsourcing to segment the optic cup and disc of multicolor fundus images.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Performance Evaluation of Different Object Detection Models for the Segmentation of Optical Cups and Discs.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multicolor scanning laser imaging (MCI) images have broad application potential in the diagnosis of fundus diseases such as glaucoma. However, the performance level of automatic aided diagnosis systems based on MCI images is limited by the lack of high-quality annotations of numerous images. Producing annotations for vast amounts of MCI images will be a prolonged process if we only employ experts. Therefore, we consider non-expert crowdsourcing, which is an alternative approach to produce useful annotations efficiently and low cost. In this work, we aim to explore the effectiveness of non-expert crowdsourcing on the segmentation of the optic cup (OC) and optic disc (OD), which is an upstream task for glaucoma diagnosis, using MCI images. To this end, desensitized MCI images are independently annotated by four non-expert annotators, constructing a crowdsourcing dataset. To profit from crowdsourcing, we propose a model consisting of coupled regularization network and segmentation network. The regularization network generates learnable pixel-wise confusion matrices (CMs) that reflects preferences of each annotator. During training, the CMs and segmentation network are simultaneously optimized to enable dynamic trade-offs for non-expert annotations and generate reliable predictions. Crowdsourcing learning using our method have an average Mean Intersection Over Union (
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.