Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35991742›Full record

ArticleProceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center)2022

Women in the Mayo Clinic Department of Neurology in its early years.

Kelsey M Smith, Christopher J Boes, Elizabeth A Coon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kelsey M SmithDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8659-3801
Christopher J BoesDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Elizabeth A CoonDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1206-0222

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The stories of early women physicians in the field of neurology are seldom discussed. Understanding the history behind women in neurology can inform our current practice and uncover the possible origins of gender disparities in academic neurology. Utilizing annual section/department reports and other primary sources, we describe the first women trainees and staff who broke gender barriers to train and work in the Mayo Clinic Department of Neurology. The department was founded in 1913 when Walter Shelden became its first consultant. It was not until the 1950s that a woman completed her neurology training and went on to practice neurology. Throughout the early years of the training program, there were no women on staff, as it was not until the 1970s when the first women were hired as consultants.

Indexed as

Historyneurologywomen in medicine

Identifiers

PMID35991742
PMCPMC9373777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.