ArticleJournal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A, (Statistics in Society)2020
Outcome-dependent sampling in cluster-correlated data settings with application to hospital profiling.
Article in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A, (Statistics in Society), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Competing Risk Modeling with Bivariate Varying Coefficients to Understand the Dynamic Impact of COVID-19.Journal of computational and graphical statistics : a joint publication of American Statistical Association, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Interface Foundation of North America · 2024Article
- High-Dimensional Fixed Effects Profiling Models and Applications in End-Stage Kidney Disease Patients: Current State and Future Directions.International journal of statistics in medical research · 2023Article
- Analysis of hospital readmissions with competing risks.Statistical methods in medical research · 2022Article
- Improving large-scale estimation and inference for profiling health care providers.Statistics in medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hospital readmission is a key marker of quality of healthcare and an important policy measure, used by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to determine, in part, reimbursement rates. Currently, analyses of readmissions are based on a logistic-normal generalized linear mixed model that permits estimation of hospital-specific measures while adjusting for case mix differences. Recent moves to identify and address healthcare disparities call for expanding case mix adjustment to include measures of socio-economic status while minimizing additional burden to hospitals associated with collecting data on such measures. Towards resolving this dilemma, we propose that detailed socio-economic data be collected on a subsample of patients via an outcome-dependent sampling scheme, specifically the cluster-stratified case-control design. Estimation and inference, for both the fixed and the random-effects components, are performed via pseudo-maximum-likelihood wherein inverse probability weights are incorporated in the usual integrated likelihood to account for the design. In comprehensive simulations, cluster-stratified case-control sampling proves to be an efficient design whenever interest lies in fixed or random effects of a generalized linear mixed model and covariates are unobserved or expensive to collect. The methods are motivated by and illustrated with an analysis of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.