Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35991527›Full record

ArticleJournal of social and personal relationships2022

Exploring the nature and variation of the stigma associated with loneliness.

Manuela Barreto, Jolien van Breen, Christina Victor, Claudia Hammond, Alice Eccles, Matthew T Richins, Pamela Qualter

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of social and personal relationships, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
18.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 125 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. "Being alone is no fun"- experiences with loneliness by older people: a qualitative study.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Manuela BarretoDepartment of Psychology, University of Exeter, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6973-7233
Jolien van BreenDepartment of Psychology, University of Exeter, UK.
Christina VictorDepartment of Health Sciences, Brunel University, London, UK.
Claudia HammondRadio Science Unit, British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC), London, UK.
Alice EcclesManchester Institute of Education, University of Manchester, UK.
Matthew T RichinsDepartment of Psychology, University of Exeter, UK.
Pamela QualterManchester Institute of Education, University of Manchester, UK.
University of Exeter · GBUniversity of Manchester · GBBritish Broadcasting Corporation (United Kingdom) · GBBrunel University of London · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current study uses data from The British Broadcasting Corporation Loneliness Experiment to explore the social stigma of loneliness and how it varies by gender, age and cultural individualism. We examined stigmatizing judgements of people who are lonely (impressions of those who feel lonely and attributions for loneliness), perceived stigma in the community and self-stigma (shame for being lonely and inclination to conceal loneliness), while controlling for participants' own feelings of loneliness. The scores on most measures fell near the mid-point of the scales, but stigmatizing perceptions depended on the measure of stigmatization that was used and on age, gender and country-level individualism. Multilevel analyses revealed that men had more stigmatizing perceptions, more perceived community stigma, but less self-stigma than women; young people had higher scores than older people on all indicators except for internal versus external attributions and people living in collectivist countries perceived loneliness as more controllable and perceived more stigma in the community than people living in individualistic countries. Finally, young men living in individualistic countries made the most internal (vs. external) attributions for loneliness. We discuss the implications of these findings for understandings of loneliness stigma and interventions to address loneliness.

Indexed as

ageculturegenderindividualismlonelinessloneliness stigmaStigma

Identifiers

PMID35991527
PMCPMC9386761
OpenAlexW4224290208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.