Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35991448›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2022

SlypNet: Spikelet-based yield prediction of wheat using advanced plant phenotyping and computer vision techniques.

Arpan K Maji, Sudeep Marwaha, Sudhir Kumar, Alka Arora, Viswanathan Chinnusamy, Shahnawazul Islam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Arpan K MajiDivision of Computer Application, Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, India.
Sudeep MarwahaDivision of Computer Application, Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, India.
Sudhir KumarDivision of Crop Physiology, Indian Agricultural Research Institute (ICAR), New Delhi, India.
Alka AroraDivision of Computer Application, Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, India.
Viswanathan ChinnusamyDivision of Crop Physiology, Indian Agricultural Research Institute (ICAR), New Delhi, India.
Shahnawazul IslamDivision of Computer Application, Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The application of computer vision in agriculture has already contributed immensely to restructuring the existing field practices starting from the sowing to the harvesting. Among the different plant parts, the economic part, the yield, has the highest importance and becomes the ultimate goal for the farming community. It depends on many genetic and environmental factors, so this curiosity about knowing the yield brought several precise pre-harvest prediction methods using different ways. Out of those techniques, non-invasive yield prediction techniques using computer vision have been proved to be the most efficient and trusted platform. This study developed a novel methodology, called SlypNet, using advanced deep learning networks, i.e., Mask R-CNN and U-Net, which can extract various plant morphological features like spike and spikelet from the visual image of the wheat plant and provide a high-throughput yield estimate with great precision. Mask R-CNN outperformed previous networks in spike detection by its precise detection performance with a mean average precision (mAP) of 97.57%, a F1 score of 0.67, and an MCC of 0.91 by overcoming several natural field constraints like overlapping and background interference, variable resolution, and high bushiness of plants. The spikelet detection module's accuracy and consistency were tested with about 99% validation accuracy of the model and the least error, i.e., a mean square error of 1.3 from a set of typical and complex views of wheat spikes. Spikelet yield cumulatively showed the probable production capability of each plant. Our method presents an integrated deep learning platform of spikelet-based yield prediction comprising spike and spikelet detection, leading to higher precision over the existing methods.

Indexed as

Computer visiondeep learningplant phenotypingsegmentationSlypNetspike detectionspikelet detectionyield prediction

Identifiers

PMID35991448
PMCPMC9386505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.