ArticleBulletin of emergency and trauma2022
The Role of Surgical and Endovascular Repair of Blunt Traumatic Aortic Injury in the Modern Era: A Single-Center Experience.
Article in Bulletin of emergency and trauma, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of chest x-ray (CXR) in blunt traumatic aortic injury (BTAI) as a primary imaging tool in trauma patients. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed our hospital records for blunt thoracic aortic injury patients who had a therapeutic intervention from January 2015 to February 2021. Patients' characteristics, initial chest x-rays, and computed tomography (CT) scan were extracted and re-evaluated. Results: Eighteen patients matched the criteria of our research. The mean age and the injury severity score (ISS) was 29.8±11.2 and 38.4±14.4, respectively. Seven patients (38.9%) underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), and 11 (61.1%) had open surgery. The TEVAR group had significantly lower mean intensive care unit stay days (6.6±3.9 vs. 10.8±6.9 in open aortic repair (OAR), Conclusion: TEVAR is an advantageous choice in the management of BTAI. However, open aortic repair is the optimal decision in certain situations. It is suggested that the Interventional management of the BTAI must be performed by experienced vascular surgeons in a medical center capable of both OAR and TEVAR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.