ArticleInternational journal of exercise science2022
The Association Between Handgrip Strength Asymmetry Severity and Future Morbidity Accumulation: Results from the Health and Retirement Study.
Article in International journal of exercise science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Relationship of handgrip strength, asymmetries, and calf circumference with functional capacity in individuals with intellectual disabilities: an age group analysis.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Association of handgrip strength asymmetry and weakness with functional disability among middle-aged and older adults in China.Journal of global health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Analyzing the severity of handgrip strength (HGS) asymmetry in aging populations may help to screen for morbidities and add utility to handgrip dynamometer testing. Our study sought to determine the relationships between HGS asymmetry severity and future accumulating morbidities in older Americans. Secondary analyses from the 2006-2016 waves of the Health and Retirement Study included 18,506 adults ≥ 50 years old. The highest recorded HGS values from each hand were used to calculate HGS asymmetry ratio (non-dominant HGS/dominant HGS). If the HGS asymmetry ratio < 1.0, it was inversed to make all asymmetry ratios ≥ 1.0. Participants were categorized into groups based on the severity of their HGS asymmetry ratio: 1) 0.0% - 10.0%, 2) 10.1% - 20.0%, 3) 20.1% - 30.0%, and 4) > 30.0%. Healthcare provider-diagnosed morbidities (hypertension, diabetes, cancer, chronic lung disease, cardiovascular disease, stroke, arthritis, and psychiatric problems) were self-reported. Covariate-adjusted ordinal generalized estimating equations evaluated the relationships between HGS asymmetry severity on future accumulating morbidities. Results showed 8,936 (48.3%) participants had HGS asymmetry 0.0%-10.0%, 6,105 (33.0%) participants had HGS asymmetry 10.1%-20.0%, 2,411 (13.0%) participants had HGS asymmetry 20.1%-30.0%, and 1,054 (5.7%) participants had HGS asymmetry > 30.0%. Overall, every 10% increase in HGS asymmetry was associated with a 1.17 (CI: 1.05, 1.32) greater odds of future morbidity accumulation. Additionally, asymmetry between 10.1% - 20.0%, 20.1% - 30.0%, and > 30.0% was associated with a 1.10 (CI: 1.05, 1.15), 1.11 (CI: 1.04, 1.18), and 1.20 (CI: 1.09, 1.33) greater odds for morbidity accumulation during aging. These findings suggest that severe functional asymmetries may elevate the odds for accumulating morbidities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.