ArticleEcological indicators2022
Physical habitat in conterminous US streams and Rivers, part 2: A quantitative assessment of habitat condition.
Article in Ecological indicators, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrating theory and empirical patterns: Fish body size distributions, life history traits, and environmental flows in streams.Science advances · 2025Article
- A model-based assessment of anthropogenic disturbance on lotic macroinvertebrate assemblages.Ecosphere (Washington, D.C) · 2025Article
- Waterbody connectivity: Linking science and policy for improved waterbody protection.Bioscience · 2025Article
- Quantifying form resistance is essential for estimating summer low and bankfull flow from stream survey channel morphology.Geomorphology (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024Article
- Habitat Diversity Mitigates the Impacts of Human Pressure on Stream Biodiversity.Global change biology · 2024Article
- A method for evaluating sediment-induced macroinvertebrate community composition changes in Idaho streams.PeerJ · 2024Article
- Disentangling natural and anthropogenic effects on benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages in western US streams.Ecosphere (Washington, D.C) · 2023Article
- Patterns in and predictors of stream and river macroinvertebrate genera and fish species richness across the conterminous USA.Knowledge and management of aquatic ecosystems · 2023Article
- Physical habitat in conterminous US streams and rivers, Part 1: Geoclimatic controls and anthropogenic alteration.Ecological indicators · 2022Article
- Wood stock in neotropical streams: Quantifying and comparing instream wood among biomes and regions.PloS one · 2022Article
- Sampling Efforts for Estimating Fish Species Richness in Western USA River Sites.Limnologica (Online) · 2021Article
- Big data challenges in overcoming China's water and air pollution: relevant data and indicators.SN applied sciences · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Rigorous assessments of the ecological condition of water resources and the effect of human activities on those waters require quantitative physical, chemical, and biological data. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's river and stream surveys quantify river and stream bed particle size and stability, instream habitat complexity and cover, riparian vegetation cover and structure, and anthropogenic disturbance activities. Physical habitat is strongly controlled by natural geoclimatic factors that co-vary with human activities. We expressed the anthropogenic alteration of physical habitat as O/E ratios of observed habitat metric values divided by values expected under least-disturbed reference conditions, where site-specific expected values vary given their geoclimatic and geomorphic context. We set criteria for good, fair, and poor condition based on the distribution of O/E values in regional least-disturbed reference sites. Poor conditions existed in 22-24% of the 1.2 million km of streams and rivers in the conterminous U.S. for riparian human disturbance, streambed sediment and riparian vegetation cover, versus 14% for instream habitat complexity. Based on the same four indicators, the percentage of stream length in poor condition within 9 separate U.S. ecoregions ranged from 4% to 42%. Associations of our physical habitat indices with anthropogenic pressures demonstrate the scope of anthropogenic habitat alteration; habitat condition was negatively related to the level of anthropogenic disturbance nationally and in nearly all ecoregions. Relative risk estimates showed that streams and rivers with poor sediment, riparian cover complexity, or instream habitat cover conditions were 1.4 to 2.6 times as likely to also have fish or macroinvertebrate assemblages in poor condition. Our physical habitat condition indicators help explain deviations in biological conditions from those observed among least-disturbed sites and inform management actions for rehabilitating impaired waters and mitigating further ecological degradation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.