Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35991303›Full record

ArticleACS applied polymer materials2022

3D Printability Assessment of Poly(octamethylene maleate (anhydride) citrate) and Poly(ethylene glycol) Diacrylate Copolymers for Biomedical Applications.

Dominic J Wales, Meysam Keshavarz, Carmel Howe, Eric Yeatman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS applied polymer materials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Porous Hydrogels for Immunomodulatory Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  13. Let's Print an Ecology in 3D (and 4D).Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dominic J WalesHamlyn Centre, Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, U.K.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3696-4867
Meysam KeshavarzHamlyn Centre, Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, U.K.
Carmel HoweDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom.
Eric YeatmanDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, U.K.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Herein, we present the first example of 3D printing with poly(octamethylene maleate (anhydride) citrate) (POMaC), a bio-adhesive material which has shown particular promise for implantable biomedical devices. The current methods to fabricate such devices made from POMaC are hindered by the imposed constraints of designing complex molds. We demonstrate the feasibility of exploiting additive manufacturing to 3D print structural functional materials consisting of POMaC. We present 3D printing of biomaterial copolymers consisting of mixtures of poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEGDA) and POMaC at different ratios. The required parameters were optimized, and characterization of the printing fidelity and physical properties was performed. We have also demonstrated that a range of mechanical properties can be achieved by tuning the POMaC/PEGDA ratio. The biocompatibility of the copolymers was ascertained via a cell viability assay. Such tunable 3D printed biomaterials consisting of POMaC and PEGDA will have significant potential application in the development of functional biomaterial tissue scaffolds and biomedical devices for the future of personalized medicine.

Identifiers

PMID35991303
PMCPMC9379906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.