Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35991297›Full record

ArticleJournal of healthcare engineering2022

Pneumonia Detection in Chest X-Ray Images Using Enhanced Restricted Boltzmann Machine.

Fazli Wahid, Sania Azhar, Sikandar Ali, Muhammad Sultan Zia, Faisal Abdulaziz Almisned, Abdu Gumaei

RetractedAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of healthcare engineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fazli WahidDepartment of Information Technology, The University of Haripur, Haripur 22620, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0003-4614-1610
Sania AzharDepartment of Computer Science, The University of Chenab, Gujrat, Pakistan.
Sikandar AliDepartment of Information Technology, The University of Haripur, Haripur 22620, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-2753-8615
Muhammad Sultan ZiaDepartment of Computer Science, The University of Chenab, Gujrat, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-9348-2197
Faisal Abdulaziz AlmisnedSTC's Artificial Intelligence Chair, Department of Information Systems, College of Computer and Information Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11543, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-4324-6110
Abdu GumaeiComputer Science Department, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Taiz University, Taiz 6803, Yemen.ORCID 0000-0001-8512-9687

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The process of pneumonia detection has been the focus of researchers as it has proved itself to be one of the most dangerous and life-threatening disorders. In recent years, many machine learning and deep learning algorithms have been applied in an attempt to automate this process but none of them has been successful significantly to achieve the highest possible accuracy. In a similar attempt, we propose an enhanced approach of a deep learning model called restricted Boltzmann machine (RBM) which is named enhanced RBM (ERBM). One of the major drawbacks associated with the standard format of RBM is its random weight initialization which leads to improper feature learning of the model during the training phase, resulting in poor performance of the machine. This problem has been tried to eliminate in this work by finding the differences between the means of a specific feature vector and the means of all features given as inputs to the machine. By performing this process, the reconstruction of the actual features is increased which ultimately reduces the error generated during the training phase of the model. The developed model has been applied to three different datasets of pneumonia diseases and the results have been compared with other state of the art techniques using different performance evaluation parameters. The proposed model gave highest accuracy of 98.56% followed by standard RBM, SVM, KNN, and decision tree which gave accuracies of 97.53%, 92.62%, 91.64%, and 88.77%, respectively, for dataset named dataset 2. Similarly, for the dataset 1, the highest accuracy of 96.66 has been observed for the eRBM followed by srRBM, KNN, decision tree, and SVM which gave accuracies of 90.22%, 89.34%, 87.65%, and 86.55%, respectively. In the same way, the accuracies observed for the dataset 3 by eRBM, standard RBM, KNN, decision tree, and SVM are 92.45%, 90.98%, 87.54%, 85.49%, and 84.54%, respectively. Similar observations can also be seen for other performance parameters showing the efficiency of the proposed model. As revealed in the results obtained, a significant improvement has been observed in the working of the RBM by introducing a new method of weight initialization during the training phase. The results show that the improved model outperforms other models in terms of different performance evaluation parameters, namely, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity,

Indexed as

Machine LearningPneumoniaAlgorithmsHumansROC CurveX-Rays

Identifiers

PMID35991297
PMCPMC9391129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.