ArticleFrontiers in neuroinformatics2022
A standardized accelerometry method for characterizing tremor: Application and validation in an ageing population with postural and action tremor.
Article in Frontiers in neuroinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Fully Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Compatible, Nonelectrical System for Near-Real-Time Tremor Monitoring during Magnetic Resonance-Guided Focused Ultrasound.Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery · 2026Article
- Objective tremor monitoring using tri-axis accelerometer in MRgFUS thalamotomy for essential tremor: a feasibility study.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2026Article
- Essential Tremor and Digital Biomarkers: A Scoping Review Using the TRACE Framework to Map Readiness for Clinical Trials and Routine Practice.Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Sit Still or Move More? The Impact of Fidgeting on Creativity.Journal of educational psychology · 2025Article
- Smartwatch-based wrist tremor assessment in neurosurgical simulator training.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Differentiating Postural and Kinetic Tremor Responses to Deep Brain Stimulation in Essential Tremor.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2025Article
- Quantitative and qualitative tremor evaluation after MR-guided focused ultrasound thalamotomy.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Estimating Disability in Patients with Essential Tremor: Comparison of Tremor Rating Scale, Spiral Drawing, and Accelerometric Tremor Power.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2024Article
- Leg stereotypy syndrome: phenomenological and quantitative analysis.Journal of neurology · 2024Article
- Upper limb intention tremor assessment: opportunities and challenges in wearable technology.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2024Review
- Accelerometric Classification of Resting and Postural Tremor Amplitude.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Tracking motion kinematics and tremor with intrinsic oscillatory property of instrumental mechanics.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ordinal scales based on qualitative observation are the mainstay in the clinical assessment of tremor, but are limited by inter-rater reliability, measurement precision, range, and ceiling effects. Quantitative tremor evaluation is well-developed in research, but clinical application has lagged, in part due to cumbersome mathematical application and lack of established standards. Objectives: To develop a novel method for evaluating tremor that integrates a standardized clinical exam, wrist-watch accelerometers, and a software framework for data analysis that does not require advanced mathematical or computing skills. The utility of the method was tested in a sequential cohort of patients with predominant postural and action tremor presenting to a specialized surgical clinic with the presumptive diagnosis of Essential Tremor (ET). Methods: Wristwatch accelerometry was integrated with a standardized clinical exam. A MATLAB application was developed for automated data analysis and graphical representation of tremor. Measures from the power spectrum of acceleration of tremor in different upper limb postures were derived in 25 consecutive patients. The linear results from accelerometry were correlated with the commonly used non-linear Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor (CRST). Results: The acceleration power spectrum was reliably produced in all consecutive patients. Tremor frequency was stable in different postures and across patients. Both total and peak power of acceleration during postural conditions correlated well with the CRST. The standardized clinical examination with integrated accelerometry measures was therefore effective at characterizing tremor in a population with predominant postural and action tremor. The protocol is also illustrated on repeated measures in an ET patient who underwent Magnetic Resonance-Guided Focused Ultrasound thalamotomy. Conclusion: Quantitative assessment of tremor as a continuous variable using wristwatch accelerometry is readily applicable as a clinical tool when integrated with a standardized clinical exam and a user-friendly software framework for analysis. The method is validated for patients with predominant postural and action tremor, and can be adopted for characterizing tremor of different etiologies with dissemination in a wide variety of clinical and research contexts in ageing populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.