ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences
Clinical application of directional dilation in transurethral columnar balloon dilation of the prostate.
Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of directional dilation in transurethral columnar balloon dilation of the prostate (TUCBDP), and summarize relevant experience. Methods: Retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of 38 patients with prostatic hyperplasia admitted to the Department of Urology, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University from October 2017 to January 2020 who underwent TUCBDP with directional dilation (12 o'clock direction). Complications related to surgery including hemorrhage, urinary incontinence and pain were analyzed. Moreover, patients were followed up for six months postoperatively, and their preoperative and postoperative maximum urine flow rate (Qmax), residual bladder volume (PVR), international prostate symptom score (IPSS), and quality of life score (QoL) were compared. Results: Thirty-eight patients underwent TUCBDP successfully, with dilation positions all in the 12 o'clock direction and no ectopic dilation point. All patients had no severe hematuria postoperatively. Numeric rating scales (NRS) was utilized twice at 8h and 24hour postoperatively to score the pain degree, with no statistically significant difference (P=0.157). Hb was reexamined on the first day postoperatively, with no statistically significant difference compared with that preoperatively (P>0.05). The bladder irrigation time was 1-2 Day postoperatively, while the urethra was removed five days postoperatively, with no severe hematuria in all patients. Two patients developed mild urinary incontinence, which disappeared on the 2nd and 5th day after extubation, respectively, while no patients had dysuria and urinary retention. All 38 patients were detected for Qmax and PVR after urethral removal, with a statistically significant difference compared with those preoperatively (P<0.001), and were reexamined three months postoperatively for Qmax and PVR, with a statistically significant difference compared with those postoperatively (P<0.001); IPSS and QoL were significantly different from those preoperatively with statistically significance (P<0.001). At the follow-up six months postoperatively, Qmax, PVR and IPSS showed statistically significant differences compared with that at three months postoperatively (P<0.05), while QoL showed no statistically significant differences compared with that at 3 months postoperatively (P=0.088). Conclusion: Directional dilation is improved in TUCBDP as having the advantages of safety and effectiveness, and it is worthy of clinical promotion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.