Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35991141›Full record

SynthesisComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2022

Efficacy of Postoperative Analgesia by Erector Spinal Plane Block after Lumbar Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Xiao Xiao, Tingting Zhu, Lin Wang, Hongmei Zhou, Yanli Zhang

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiao XiaoDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Second Hospital of Jiaxing, China.
Tingting ZhuDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Second Hospital of Jiaxing, China.
Lin WangDepartment of Anesthesia Operating Room, The Second Hospital of Jiaxing, China.
Hongmei ZhouDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Second Hospital of Jiaxing, China.
Yanli ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Second Hospital of Jiaxing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2215-9034
First Hospital of Jiaxing · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In recent years, erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has been increasingly used as a new regional block technique for postoperative analgesia; however, little is known on its benefits. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy and safety of ESPB in lumbar spine surgery. Methods: Databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ESPB with no block in lumbar spine surgery until September 30, 2021. The primary outcome was opioid consumption after surgery. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing the risk of bias was used to evaluate the quality of included studies. Results: Fifteen RCTs involving 980 patients were included in the study. Opioid consumption 24 hours after surgery was significantly lower in the ESPB group standardized mean difference (SMD = -2.27, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) (-3.21, -1.32); Conclusion: EPSB provides effective and safe postoperative analgesia after lumbar spine surgery.

Indexed as

AnalgesiaNerve BlockAnalgesics, OpioidHumansPostoperative PainRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnalgesics, Opioid

Identifiers

PMID35991141
PMCPMC9388271
OpenAlexW4291001311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.