Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35991083›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical and translational research2022

Systemic anti-inflammatory effects of mesenchymal stem cells in burn: A systematic review of animal studies.

Abdullah S Eldaly, Sarah M Mashaly, Eslam Fouda, Omar S Emam, Amro Aglan, Jumanah Abuasbeh, Aditya Khurana, Hiba Hamdar, Ayman R Fath

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical and translational research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Olig2Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Erectile dysfunction and exosome therapy.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Abdullah S EldalyDivision of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
Sarah M MashalyDepartment of Dermatology, El-Menshawy General Hospital, Tanta, Egypt.
Eslam FoudaDivision of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
Omar S EmamDivision of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
Amro AglanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Lahey Clinic Beth Israel, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jumanah AbuasbehDepartment of Public Health, University of Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona.
Aditya KhuranaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Creighton University Health Education Alliance, Phoenix, Arizona.
Hiba HamdarDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Notre Dame Maritime Hospital, Byblos, Lebanon.
Ayman R FathDepartment of Internal Medicine, Creighton University Health Education Alliance, Phoenix, Arizona.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Notre Dame des Secours · LBMayo Clinic in Florida · USUniversity of Arizona · USWinnMed · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Despite the advances in burn care, severe burns still impose significant morbidity and mortality. Severe burns are associated with an inflammatory response that ranges from alterations in vital signs to shock, multiorgan failure, and death. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are known for their anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects. Therefore, MSCs were investigated for their potential benefits in modulating burn-induced inflammation and organ damage in several studies. Aim: We have conducted a systematic review of the literature to evaluate the efficacy of MSCs in modulating burn-induced systemic inflammation and organ damage in animal models. Methods: Four databases were searched: PubMed, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Scopus, and Web of Science. We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis as our basis of organization. Results: Eight studies were included in the study. Bone marrow derived MSCs, umbilical cord derived MSCs (UC-MSCs), and UC-MSCs exosomes were used to modulate the burn-induced inflammation. MSCs therapy reduced serum levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, improved renal function, inhibited tissue damage, and improved survival after burn. Furthermore, MSCs reversed all the burn-induced pathological changes in blood brain barrier (BBB). Conclusion: MSCs may attenuate the burn-induced inflammation by decreasing serum levels of inflammatory cytokines. However, the effect on anti-inflammatory cytokines is conflicting and mandates more substantial evidence. Furthermore, MSCs reduce tissue inflammation, tissue damage, and apoptosis in the lungs and kidneys. In addition, MSCs reversed the burn-induced pathophysiologic changes in the BBB. The underlying mechanisms of these effects are poorly understood and should be the focus of future stem cell research. Relevance to Patients: Severe burn patients are liable to systemic inflammation due to the release of inflammatory cytokines into the circulation. This inflammatory response has a broad spectrum of severity that ranges from alterations in vital signs to multiorgan failure and death. Despite the advances in burn care, burn-induced inflammation still imposes significant morbidity and mortality. This systematic review evaluates the potential benefits of stem cells in modulating burn-induced systemic inflammation in animal burn models.

Indexed as

animal modelsburnexosomesmesenchymal stem cellssystemic inflammation

Identifiers

PMID35991083
PMCPMC9389574
OpenAlexW4285819470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.