ReviewJournal of clinical and translational research2022
Systemic anti-inflammatory effects of mesenchymal stem cells in burn: A systematic review of animal studies.
Review in Journal of clinical and translational research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Innovative Pathways in Burn Treatment: Exosomes and the New Era of Regenerative Medicine.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- The short-term and long-term effect of burn on organ dysfunction: mechanisms and strategies.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Efficacy and Mechanism of Highly Active Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells in the Treatment of Osteoporosis in Rats.Current stem cell research & therapy · 2025Article
- Exosome applications for the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: An update (Review).Oncology reports · 2025Review
- Umbilical cord stem cells therapy against bacterial pneumonia based on zebrafish pneumonia model.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes promote wound healing and skin regeneration via the regulation of inflammation and angiogenesis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Olig2Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B · 2024Article
- Umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells: A novel approach to intervention of ovarian ageing.Regenerative therapy · 2024Review
- Erectile dysfunction and exosome therapy.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Review
- Intervention effects of traditional Chinese medicine on stem cell therapy of myocardial infarction.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite the advances in burn care, severe burns still impose significant morbidity and mortality. Severe burns are associated with an inflammatory response that ranges from alterations in vital signs to shock, multiorgan failure, and death. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are known for their anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects. Therefore, MSCs were investigated for their potential benefits in modulating burn-induced inflammation and organ damage in several studies. Aim: We have conducted a systematic review of the literature to evaluate the efficacy of MSCs in modulating burn-induced systemic inflammation and organ damage in animal models. Methods: Four databases were searched: PubMed, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Scopus, and Web of Science. We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis as our basis of organization. Results: Eight studies were included in the study. Bone marrow derived MSCs, umbilical cord derived MSCs (UC-MSCs), and UC-MSCs exosomes were used to modulate the burn-induced inflammation. MSCs therapy reduced serum levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, improved renal function, inhibited tissue damage, and improved survival after burn. Furthermore, MSCs reversed all the burn-induced pathological changes in blood brain barrier (BBB). Conclusion: MSCs may attenuate the burn-induced inflammation by decreasing serum levels of inflammatory cytokines. However, the effect on anti-inflammatory cytokines is conflicting and mandates more substantial evidence. Furthermore, MSCs reduce tissue inflammation, tissue damage, and apoptosis in the lungs and kidneys. In addition, MSCs reversed the burn-induced pathophysiologic changes in the BBB. The underlying mechanisms of these effects are poorly understood and should be the focus of future stem cell research. Relevance to Patients: Severe burn patients are liable to systemic inflammation due to the release of inflammatory cytokines into the circulation. This inflammatory response has a broad spectrum of severity that ranges from alterations in vital signs to multiorgan failure and death. Despite the advances in burn care, burn-induced inflammation still imposes significant morbidity and mortality. This systematic review evaluates the potential benefits of stem cells in modulating burn-induced systemic inflammation in animal burn models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35991083PMC9389574W4285819470What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.