Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35991061›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2022

Knowledge and beliefs about vaccination in pregnant women before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Stefania Bruno, Lorenza Nachira, Leonardo Villani, Viria Beccia, Andrea Di Pilla, Domenico Pascucci, Gianluigi Quaranta, Brigida Carducci, Antonietta Spadea, Gianfranco Damiani and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Stefania BrunoWomen, Children and Public Health Sciences Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Lorenza NachiraSection of Hygiene, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Leonardo VillaniSection of Hygiene, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Viria BecciaMedical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Andrea Di PillaSection of Hygiene, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Domenico PascucciWomen, Children and Public Health Sciences Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Gianluigi QuarantaWomen, Children and Public Health Sciences Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Brigida CarducciWomen, Children and Public Health Sciences Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Antonietta SpadeaItaly Local Health Authority, ASL ROMA 1, Rome, Italy.
Gianfranco DamianiWomen, Children and Public Health Sciences Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Antonio LanzoneWomen, Children and Public Health Sciences Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Bruno FedericoDepartment of Human Sciences, Society and Health, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, Cassino, Frosinone, Italy.
Patrizia LaurentiWomen, Children and Public Health Sciences Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITAgostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITAzienda Sanitaria Locale Roma 3 · ITUniversità degli studi di Cassino e del Lazio Meridionale · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Vaccine hesitancy threatens the health of populations and challenges Public Health professionals. Strategies to reduce it aim to improve people's risk perception about vaccine-preventable diseases, fill knowledge gaps about vaccines and increase trust in healthcare providers. During pregnancy, educational interventions can provide a proper knowledge about safety and efficacy of maternal and childhood vaccinations. Fighting hesitancy and clarifying doubts is fundamental during the COVID-19 pandemic, which may have affected people's knowledge and beliefs toward vaccination. This study aimed at assessing if the advent of the pandemic was associated with changes in pregnant women's knowledge and beliefs toward vaccination, and trust in healthcare services. Methods: A repeated cross-sectional study was conducted through self-reported questionnaires in a Roman teaching hospital, where educational classes about vaccinations are routinely held as part of a birthing preparation course. Data were collected on a sample of pregnant women before and during the pandemic. Free-of-charge flu vaccinations were offered to all course participants and adherence to flu vaccination was assessed. Results: The proportion of pregnant women reporting that vaccines have mild side effects and that are sufficiently tested increased from 78.6 to 92.0% ( Conclusions: The pandemic may have positively affected pregnant women's knowledge and opinions about vaccinations and trust in HCWs, despite a possible negative impact on their perceptions about NHS operators. This should inspire Public Health professionals to rethink their role as health communicators.

Indexed as

COVID-19Influenza VaccinesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansPandemicsPregnancyPregnant PeopleState MedicineVaccinationInfluenza VaccinesCOVID-19knowledgepregnancyvaccinationvaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID35991061
PMCPMC9386522
OpenAlexW4289839523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.