ArticleFrontiers in public health2022
The DEMATEL method explores the interdependent relationship structure and weights for diagnosis-related groups system.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Psychological resilience factors in intensive care nursing: a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making model.BMC nursing · 2024Article
- Improve the satisfaction of medical staff on the use of home nursing mobile APP by using a hybrid multi-standard decision model.BMC nursing · 2024Article
- Identifying key mental health and improvement factors in hospital administrators working from home using a DEMATEL-based network analysis model.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Identification of critical quality factors and critical satisfaction gaps in emergency training courses for new nurses by the multi-criteria network structure model.BMC medical education · 2023Article
- Does the disclosure of medical insurance information affect patients' willingness to adopt the diagnosis related groups system.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study constructs a structure of interaction between dimensions and criteria within the diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) system from a quantitative system and identifies key factors affecting the overall performance of medical services. Method: From September to December 2020, the influence relation structure diagram (IRSD) of the dimensions and corresponding criteria was developed from the practical experience of a group of domain experts, based on the DEMATEL method. Subsequently, all dimensions and criteria construct influential weights from a systems perspective. Finally, the main influential factors were identified based on the analysis results. Results: The IRSD results showed that, in the overall performance of medical services, "Medical service capacity ( Conclusion: Patients and managers should first focus on the capacity of medical service providers when making a choice or deciding using the results of the DRGs system. Furthermore, they should pay more attention to medical safety even if it is not as weighted as medical efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.