Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35990989›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022

External validation and comparison of two delirium prediction models in patients admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit.

Sung Eun Kim, Ryoung-Eun Ko, Soo Jin Na, Chi Ryang Chung, Ki Hong Choi, Darae Kim, Taek Kyu Park, Joo Myung Lee, Young Bin Song, Jin-Oh Choi and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Retrospective evaluation of the PRE-DELIRIC score in a Chinese mixed ICU: implications for nursing practice.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sung Eun KimDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Ryoung-Eun KoDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Soo Jin NaDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Chi Ryang ChungDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Ki Hong ChoiDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Darae KimDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Taek Kyu ParkDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Joo Myung LeeDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Young Bin SongDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Jin-Oh ChoiDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Joo-Yong HahnDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Seung-Hyuk ChoiDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Hyeon-Cheol GwonDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Jeong Hoon YangDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Samsung Medical Center · KRSungkyunkwan University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: No data is available on delirium prediction models in the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU), although preexisting delirium prediction models [PREdiction of DELIRium in ICu patients (PRE-DELIRIC) and Early PREdiction of DELIRium in ICu patients (E-PRE-DELIRIC)] were developed and validated based on a population admitted to the general intensive care unit (ICU). Therefore, we externally validated the usefulness of the PRE-DELIRIC and E-PRE-DELIRIC models and compared their predictive performance in patients admitted to the CICU. Methods: A total of 2,724 patients admitted to the CICU were enrolled between September 2012 and December 2018. Delirium was defined as at least one positive Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU) which was screened at least once every 8 h. The PRE-DELIRIC value was calculated within 24 h of CICU admission, and the E-PRE-DELIRIC value was calculated at CICU admission. The predictive performance of the models was evaluated by using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve, and the calibration slope was assessed graphically by plotting. Results: Delirium occurred in 677 patients (24.8%) when the patients were assessed thrice daily until 7 days of the CICU stay. The AUROC curve for the prediction of delirium was significantly greater for PRE-DELIRIC values [0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.82-0.86] than for E-PRE-DELIRIC values (0.79, 95% CI: 0.77-0.80) [z score of -6.24 ( Conclusion: Although both models have good predictive performance for the development of delirium, even in critically ill cardiac patients, the performance of the PRE-DELIRIC model might be superior to that of the E-PRE-DELIRIC model. Further studies are required to confirm our results and design a specific delirium prediction model for CICU patients.

Indexed as

cardiac intensive care unitdelirium predictionEarly PREdiction of DELIRiumprediction modelPREdiction of DELIRium

Identifiers

PMID35990989
PMCPMC9382019
OpenAlexW4289517626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.