ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022
Outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair with chimney technique for aortic arch diseases.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Management of Left Subclavian Artery in Aortic Open and Endovascular Surgery.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Review
- Safety and Feasibility of In Situ Fenestration in the Aortic Arch: A Prospective Single-Center Observational Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Anatomy-driven strategies and mid-term outcomes of branched endovascular repair of the aortic arch: a single-center cohort study.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Feasibility and Early and Midterm Outcomes of Midaortic Syndrome: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Hemodynamic analysis of thoracic endovascular aortic repair with left subclavian artery reconstructed by chimney stent.Vascular · 2025Article
- Endovascular repair of type B acute aortic syndromes involving the left subclavian artery: A retrospective single-centre study.PloS one · 2025Article
- Comparative Evaluation of the Short-Term Outcome of Different Endovascular Aortic Arch Procedures.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Clinical outcomes and aortic remodeling after Castor single-branched stent-graft implantation for type B aortic dissections involving left subclavian artery.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Gore cTAG sleeve-associated maldeployment for traumatic aortic injury with aberrant right subclavian artery.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to summarize the long-term experience of using the chimney technique in thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for aortic arch diseases. Methods: From November 2007 to June 2021, a total of 345 consecutive patients (mean age 56 ± 11.3 years, range 28-83, 302 men) with aortic arch pathologies underwent TEVAR combined with chimney technique (cTEVAR). Their medical data and follow-up results were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. Results: Among the 345 patients, 278 (80.6%) received single chimneys, 53 (15.4%) received double chimneys, 7 (2%) received triple chimneys, and 7 (2%) underwent cTEVAR accompanied by other techniques (two with extra-anatomical bypass, two with Conclusion: TEVAR with chimney technique provides a minimally invasive alternative with good chimney graft patency and low postoperative mortality during follow-up. However, the double and triple chimney techniques should be used cautiously as they seem to have a higher risk for type IA endoleak and adverse events after the operation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.